I was wondering which AR makers come the closest to mil-spec. Is there a web site or a document that has this information?
Who gets the closest to mil-spec?
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
-
-
-
I doubt if DPMS processes could meet milspec requirements today. They were in recent times well known in the AR Industry for too many breakable AR bolts (lugs and through the pin hole) - no way their processes and procedures are right if they allowed that to become common. Sloppy work on critical parts. This is why you need to magnaflux/particle check EVERY SINGLE BOLT with a proof round and then final MP inspection - like Colt does. Yes, good parts cost more because the process of guaranteeing quality costs more. Worth every penny. Hopefully DPMS is past that - but currently I want NOTHING DPMS in my rifle. CCLast edited by Col. Colt; 05-16-2015, 08:30.Colt, Glock and Remington factory trained LE Armorer
LE Trained Firearms InstructorComment
-
At one time Century Arms sold 'civilianized' M16A1 and M16A2 rifles. These being third-world M16 rifles imported back into the US with destroyed lower receivers and cut barrels...basically just used parts. Then rebuilt into sporter rifles with new barrels and civilian AR 15 receivers..new springs and such parts as needed.
I bought an A2 rifle and it's pretty decent..has a new 1-9 twist heavy barrel, new lower receiver, all new springs and plastic furniture..the rest being used and refinished M16 parts. Any part you can identify on mine is a Colt made piece
I look at it as a poor-boy Colt A2 Hbar Sporter. Shoots great!Comment
-
MILSPEC. measured by micrometer, cut with an axe, hammered to fit, and painted to match.Phillip McGregor (OFC)
"I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthurComment

Comment