Who gets the closest to mil-spec?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hecklerusp45
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 1174

    #1

    Who gets the closest to mil-spec?

    I was wondering which AR makers come the closest to mil-spec. Is there a web site or a document that has this information?
    "In God We Trust"
  • gwp
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 1088

    #2
    Here is the last round of this question:

    http://www.jouster.com/forums/showth...mil-spec+ar-15

    Comment

    • 4F4Nam
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 1058

      #3
      Originally posted by Hecklerusp45
      I was wondering which AR makers come the closest to mil-spec. Is there a web site or a document that has this information?
      Colt.

      Ed

      Comment

      • Hecklerusp45
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2010
        • 1174

        #4
        Thanks guys
        "In God We Trust"

        Comment

        • GA-Dave
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 289

          #5
          I asked this question in the other post. It's hard to answer because so many companies are making ARs today. Many are not on the list such as Troy, Sig, and many others. Colt is still the easiest say meets mil-spec.

          Comment

          • bd1
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2009
            • 2245

            #6
            Colt 6920's a good deal right now. Shop around, of course. They'll triple in value again next panic.

            Comment

            • albert
              Senior Member
              • May 2010
              • 354

              #7
              FN is so a military contractor.

              Comment

              • bd1
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2009
                • 2245

                #8
                Since the thread's been re-opened, anybody mention Daniel Defense or Bravo Company? Good stuff.

                Comment

                • Former Cav
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 2241

                  #9
                  dpms was a military contractor back in the 80's and 90's.
                  I'd presume they remain so.

                  Comment

                  • joem
                    Senior Member, Deceased
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 11835

                    #10
                    +1 on DPMS. Although it took almost a year for me to get my AR10 Classic.

                    Comment

                    • Col. Colt
                      Senior Member
                      • Jul 2010
                      • 928

                      #11
                      I doubt if DPMS processes could meet milspec requirements today. They were in recent times well known in the AR Industry for too many breakable AR bolts (lugs and through the pin hole) - no way their processes and procedures are right if they allowed that to become common. Sloppy work on critical parts. This is why you need to magnaflux/particle check EVERY SINGLE BOLT with a proof round and then final MP inspection - like Colt does. Yes, good parts cost more because the process of guaranteeing quality costs more. Worth every penny. Hopefully DPMS is past that - but currently I want NOTHING DPMS in my rifle. CC
                      Last edited by Col. Colt; 05-16-2015, 08:30.
                      Colt, Glock and Remington factory trained LE Armorer
                      LE Trained Firearms Instructor

                      Comment

                      • Sunray
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 3251

                        #12
                        Everything the military uses is mil-spec. Kind of a misnomer that doesn't really mean much.
                        Spelling and grammar count!

                        Comment

                        • Stephan
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2011
                          • 313

                          #13
                          At one time Century Arms sold 'civilianized' M16A1 and M16A2 rifles. These being third-world M16 rifles imported back into the US with destroyed lower receivers and cut barrels...basically just used parts. Then rebuilt into sporter rifles with new barrels and civilian AR 15 receivers..new springs and such parts as needed.

                          I bought an A2 rifle and it's pretty decent..has a new 1-9 twist heavy barrel, new lower receiver, all new springs and plastic furniture..the rest being used and refinished M16 parts. Any part you can identify on mine is a Colt made piece

                          I look at it as a poor-boy Colt A2 Hbar Sporter. Shoots great!

                          Comment

                          • PhillipM
                            Very Senior Member - OFC
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 5937

                            #14
                            MILSPEC. measured by micrometer, cut with an axe, hammered to fit, and painted to match.
                            Phillip McGregor (OFC)
                            "I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthur

                            Comment

                            • JohnMOhio
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 1545

                              #15
                              Phil, you forgot to mention: "lowest bidder."
                              Last edited by JohnMOhio; 05-26-2015, 09:55.
                              Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.
                              Author unkown.

                              Comment

                              Working...