Strange hand-stamped Springfield 1903 Receiver

[John Beard]

Thanks for the additional photos.

The receiver ring has been ground down, probably by a private individual or gunsmith and only traces of the original markings remain. While they were grinding it down, they rounded the front edge of the receiver ring. Someone then hand re-stamped the markings and serial number. This work did NOT originate from Springfield Armory. I can confirm that the serial number is the original serial number.

I speculate that the receiver ring was once drilled and tapped for a telescope. Someone then welded up the holes, then ground down the ring and re-stamped it. There's a very good chance that the receiver ring has been annealed (softened) and is no longer safe for shooting. That would explain how they were able to re-stamp it, since the receiver ring was no longer hardened.

Hope this helps. Thanks again for the additional photos!

J.B.

[chuckindenver]

NS recievers are actually easy to stamp.
i do agree, this one has been restamped poorly. receiver has been blue printed...{match faced } as well, not just ground...
i agree i can see were the holes were repaired. id bet holes on the side from a target sight were repaired as well.
and no..the were stamped after heat treatment.
holes drilled ect before heat treat..thread tapping ect after heat treatment. {other then the receiver ring.. the square threads were roughed in before heat treatment..and finished after.
i would make sure a barrel indexes right before i went any further..
you can see a flat spot on the top of the ring were they ground off the lettering.

[Doug Douglass]

I was right....blame Bubba again. Boy he sure gets around.

[rcmkhm]

Thanks, Gentlemen. Bubba sure got around. I think this one will go into the "to be cut up" pile.

[Kurt]

Thanks, Gentlemen. Bubba sure got around. I think this one will go into the "to be cut up" pile.

Guess we all know where the "to be cut up" pile is. http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=390507308

Kurt

[chuckindenver]

felonious sale.. even after seller was told it was a ground and restamped serial...

[Kurt]

Some day, someone is going to have that thing blow up in their face, all for a couple bucks in someone's pocket.

Kurt

[rcmkhm]

Felonious sale? Did you bother to read the description? Apparently not.

[pickax]

You have been outed again. A CYA description doesn't make it right.

[chuckindenver]

§ 14-160.2. Alteration, destruction, or removal of serial number from firearm; possession
of firearm with serial number removed.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to alter, deface, destroy, or remove the
permanent serial number, manufacturer's identification plate, or other permanent distinguishing
number or identification mark from any firearm with the intent thereby to conceal or
misrepresent the identity of the firearm.
(b) It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly to sell, buy, or be in possession of any
firearm on which the permanent serial number, manufacturer's identification plate, or other
permanent distinguishing number or identification mark has been altered, defaced, destroyed,
or removed for the purpose of concealing or misrepresenting the identity of the firearm.
(c) A violation of any of the provisions of this section shall be a Class H felony.

[chuckindenver]

telling someone how the felony was committed, and discribing it....still makes it a Felony...no matter how you lay it out...or how to talk about it...its still illegal.
no grey area. its black and white.
to add,
a bare receiver is not C&R transferable, only a complete weapon that hasnt been sporterized. you can look into that part of the law as well.

[rebound]

FWIW,,,,, There is no intent to misrepresent or conceal the firearm.... So the provision does not apply in this case...

[chuckindenver]

as of Jan of 2009. changing the nomanclature or removing the serial number, even if your putting the same info back on...is no longer legal.
id have to dig around a bit, but could find that new ruling as well.
facts are, that he was told it was changed, and then stated it would be destroyed, then to advertise it for sale. if you look on the ATF website and dig, you will find that selling this receiver is also not legal.
you can twist it around all you like, and chances are,..they dont care..but Felonious is still is...

[chuckindenver]

§ 478.34 Removed, obliterated, or altered serial number.
No person shall knowingly transport, ship, or receive in interstate or foreign commerce any firearm which has had the importer's or manufacturer's serial number removed, obliterated, or altered, or possess or receive any firearm which has had the importer's or manufacturer's serial number removed, obliterated, or altered and has, at any time, been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.
[T.D. ATF-313, 56 FR 32508, July 17, 1991]

[chuckindenver]

“Whoever… receives a firearm with knowledge that its serial number or identification number has been removed, defaced, altered, obliterated or mutilated in any manner shall be punished ….”

Penalties For A Conviction
A conviction for defacing a firearm’s serial number results in minimum sentence of 1 month but no more than 2 ½ years in the house of corrections and a $200 fine.

In order to prove the defendant guilty of this offense the Prosecutor must prove the following things beyond a reasonable doubt:

The item in question was a firearm;
The defendant received the firearm;
The defendant knew that the item was a firearm;
The serial number or identification number on the firearm was removed, defaced, altered, obliterated, or mutilated in some manner; and
The defendant knew that at the time he or she received the firearm the serial number had been removed, defaced, altered, in some way.
The prosecution doesn’t need to show that the defendant received the firearm. Instead all the prosecution needs to show is that the defendant knowingly took control of the firearm. The defendant can take legal control of the firearm without personally possessing the firearm.

The prosecution can’t establish that the defendant took control of the firearm simply by showing the defendant was present in the same place as the gun. In addition to showing that the defendant was present in the same place as the firearm, the prosecution must also prove that the defendant knew that the firearm was there, and had the ability and intent to exercise control over the gun.