What exactly do democrat voters like the 3 Stooges want ?...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dogtag
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 14985

    #1

    What exactly do democrat voters like the 3 Stooges want ?...

    They hate Trump and say he's doing a lousy job,
    so they obviously don't like a roaring stock market,
    millions of new jobs created, tax cuts, less regulation,
    small business success, a good health care plan.
    less immigration and a strong military. They'd rather
    let North Korea and Iran develop into nuclear capable
    countries because they think global warming is a far
    more greater threat to the planet than two unstable
    dictatorships armed with nukes.
    To say I'm nonplussed is putting it mildly.
  • JB White
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 13371

    #2
    The Three Stooges were Democrats? Then I wish the contemporary Dems were more like them!
    2016 Chicago Cubs. MLB Champions!


    **Never quite as old as the other old farts**

    Comment

    • blackhawknj
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 3754

      #3
      Actually I have read that Moe Howard was careful with his money and took control of Curley's because he wasn't. Conversely the investors and employees of MF Global found out what kind of shrewd and savvy businessman Jon Corzine was.
      And The Three Stooges were entertaining !
      Last edited by blackhawknj; 01-17-2018, 02:38.

      Comment

      • Dan Shapiro
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 5864

        #4
        Simple, the Democrats want CONTROL. (Disabuse yourself of the notion that this is the 'old' Democratic Party). They aren't "Democrats", they're Socialists. What is yours, is THEIRS, and they'll use it as they see fit. You will be told want to THINK and what to SAY. They will tell you that they value "diversity". Yeah. BORG diversity.
        "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe, while Congress is in session." Mark Twain

        Comment

        • blackhawknj
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2011
          • 3754

          #5
          They value "diversity" as long as THEY get to define it.

          Comment

          • dogtag
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 14985

            #6
            Originally posted by JB White
            The Three Stooges were Democrats? Then I wish the contemporary Dems were more like them!
            Wake up JB. We have our own 3 Stooges:
            Roadtrax, sandpebbles and togor.
            Although togor is not as far gone as the other 2

            Comment

            • togor
              Banned
              • Nov 2009
              • 17610

              #7
              DT, you're English. You can call me any name in the book and it won't bother me because you're English, and I consider that a profound handicap. And I was taught to show kindness, or at least pity, to the handicapped.

              Seriously, though, I have on the job battled subjects of the crown who speak the Queen's, and they find to their sorrow that this guy from flyover country is more than their match. But one of my best friends is Scottish, living there, so I'm not unacceptably prejudiced. He hates the English too.

              Comment

              • Roadkingtrax
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2010
                • 7835

                #8
                Originally posted by dogtag
                Wake up JB. We have our own 3 Stooges:
                Roadtrax, sandpebbles and togor.
                Although togor is not as far gone as the other 2
                I am? Haha Limey.
                "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                Comment

                • togor
                  Banned
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 17610

                  #9
                  But DT, to your question.

                  Stock market is up but valuations are high by historical terms. Correction is inevitable, possibly to pre-Trump prices. How are volumes? I haven't checked. But Bill Clinton had a nice Bull market, and so did Obama.

                  On immigration. I favor tough rules, and a national ID statement akin to a passport visa. If you don't have one, you can't get hired. With tough enforcement on Chamber of Commerce types who look the other way on immigration but vote GOP. Within that framework, give states some room to maneuver. But if they issue DLs, there should be a QR code or something that identifies the bearer as a non citizen for voting purposes. But spend the money dammit to make it convenient for ordinary poor and minority citizens too, because to me buying guns and voting are about the same. Making one way easy and the other way hard is wrong in either direction.

                  Give me a GOP or Dem candidate who thinks like that and I'll vote for them.

                  Comment

                  • Clark Howard
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 2105

                    #10
                    To address the OP's original question. Our resident dems want a President that rules by Executive Directive, a Congress and Court system that will happily rubber stamp any action he takes, and an executive branch that assists the king with regulations and rules that he desires. An IRS and FBI, not to mention the other alphabet agencies, that actively suppress and penalize any individual or organization that is not in lock-step with the king's wishes. They also appreciate a press and media that propagandizes every event and story to the king's favor. Worst of all, they have a horror of ordinary citizens who are armed, despite their pretended interest in the shooting sports. These folks also desire an economic system that is planned in Washington, where all corporations are under the control of the king, and donate whatever proceeds their business generates to the king. The old term for these guys was courtesans. The more recent description has been communists. The modern term is "progressives". The end game is "slavery". Just my take. Regards, Clark

                    Comment

                    • Bill E
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 434

                      #11
                      +1 Clark, thanks.

                      Comment

                      • Allen
                        Moderator
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 10583

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Bill E
                        +1 Clark, thanks.
                        And well stated but why waste your time? The ignore list will keep this forum alive. Giving in to George Soros' kids will run the few of us left away and give the liberals another win. It is obvious why they are here and what their goal is.

                        Comment

                        • Sandpebble
                          Senior Member
                          • Mar 2017
                          • 2196

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Clark Howard
                          To address the OP's original question. Our resident dems want a President that rules by Executive Directive, a Congress and Court system that will happily rubber stamp any action he takes, and an executive branch that assists the king with regulations and rules that he desires. An IRS and FBI, not to mention the other alphabet agencies, that actively suppress and penalize any individual or organization that is not in lock-step with the king's wishes. They also appreciate a press and media that propagandizes every event and story to the king's favor. Worst of all, they have a horror of ordinary citizens who are armed, despite their pretended interest in the shooting sports. These folks also desire an economic system that is planned in Washington, where all corporations are under the control of the king, and donate whatever proceeds their business generates to the king. The old term for these guys was courtesans. The more recent description has been communists. The modern term is "progressives". The end game is "slavery". Just my take. Regards, Clark
                          Well Clark this is rather funny that you would mention dems wanting a President that rules by executive order...... lets be realistic . All the trump supporters... and trump himself thought he was just going to change the world with the flourish of the pen. A wall... better health care... better deals all round... because it was thought that that was all it was going to take... a flourish of the pen.

                          Appreciate a press that propagandizes every event in the Kings favor... you mean like Breitbert, Fox..... the Daily Mail ?? Purveyors of Obamas a Muslum .. Obamas born in kenya... Democrats running a pedophile ring in a pizza joint

                          The horror Clark is not of the ordinary citizens being armed.... hell I'm armed and I'd put one through your forehead in a heartbeat if you came in my back window. The horror part comes where the likes of yourself and many here are afraid to take steps to prevent those that need prescription drugs to be "normal" from obtaining firearms.... because in order to do so we'd have to intrude on his privacy... and even obstruct his 2nd amendment rights...... and just where do you get off accusing others of "pretended interest" in shooting sports just because they arn't "Fox washed ?

                          The slavery part is interesting Clark .... that is exactly how I felt when I struggled financialy through George Bush the first' presidency.... and again through the presudency of his son... Dubba. Part of the reason for that slavery was "tax breaks for the rich" .... when the GOP back in the day eliminated import taxes on ceiling fans from China .... ceiling fan manufacturing here in the US ended almost overnight... to the huge benefit of Corporations like Home Depot..... if opposing that makes one a commie....

                          Comment

                          • togor
                            Banned
                            • Nov 2009
                            • 17610

                            #14


                            Corporations owe a fiduciary responsibility to their shareholders. So if union-busting,or outsourcing, hiring Mexicans, or moving a plant abroad can be shown to improve the bottom line, then these things happen. Corporations do not have an fiduciary interest in the benefit of the country. This isn't to say that a sole proprietor can't make choices that way, but just to point out something that should be understood but is overlooked. Sandpebble is right when he points out that our economic system is like a vacuum to low wage immigrants.

                            Comment

                            • leftyo

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Sandpebble
                              Well Clark this is rather funny that you would mention dems wanting a President that rules by executive order...... lets be realistic . All the trump supporters... and trump himself thought he was just going to change the world with the flourish of the pen. A wall... better health care... better deals all round... because it was thought that that was all it was going to take... a flourish of the pen.

                              Appreciate a press that propagandizes every event in the Kings favor... you mean like Breitbert, Fox..... the Daily Mail ?? Purveyors of Obamas a Muslum .. Obamas born in kenya... Democrats running a pedophile ring in a pizza joint

                              The horror Clark is not of the ordinary citizens being armed.... hell I'm armed and I'd put one through your forehead in a heartbeat if you came in my back window. The horror part comes where the likes of yourself and many here are afraid to take steps to prevent those that need prescription drugs to be "normal" from obtaining firearms.... because in order to do so we'd have to intrude on his privacy... and even obstruct his 2nd amendment rights...... and just where do you get off accusing others of "pretended interest" in shooting sports just because they arn't "Fox washed ?

                              The slavery part is interesting Clark .... that is exactly how I felt when I struggled financialy through George Bush the first' presidency.... and again through the presudency of his son... Dubba. Part of the reason for that slavery was "tax breaks for the rich" .... when the GOP back in the day eliminated import taxes on ceiling fans from China .... ceiling fan manufacturing here in the US ended almost overnight... to the huge benefit of Corporations like Home Depot..... if opposing that makes one a commie....
                              actually i think others and myself were hopeful a new president would work on limiting the EO powers after the last 8yrs of abuse.

                              Comment

                              Working...