He wins the gold medal for cowardice ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dogtag
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 14985

    #1

    He wins the gold medal for cowardice ...

    Hiding behind a concrete pillar while kids are being shot.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-shooting.html

    Couldn't see anything in the article to excuse that behavior.
  • leftyo

    #2
    have no fear, the cops will be there after its over!

    Comment

    • SloopJohnB
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 1395

      #3
      Doesn't help the victims, but that poor bastard has to live with that for the rest of his life.

      Comment

      • clintonhater
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2015
        • 5220

        #4
        The list of "official" failings just goes on & on: first & probably foremost, the social workers who, despite having seen clear evidence of the killer's psychotic tendencies, swept it all under the rug, then the FBI, now this coward Deputy. And yet who's the No. 1 Villain? The NRA.

        The victim's families should file civil negligence suits against the county social services dept., the FBI, & the Sheriff's Dept., but instead the only parties sued will probably the gun maker & gun store owner.

        - - - Updated - - -

        Originally posted by SloopJohnB
        Doesn't help the victims, but that poor bastard has to live with that for the rest of his life.
        Poor bastard? Come on.

        Comment

        • Sandpebble
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2017
          • 2196

          #5
          The man was a trained police professional... what happened to him I'm sure has happened to many in their first combat experience .....

          how do you think our school teachers will fair after their week long training course ?

          Comment

          • leftyo

            #6
            Originally posted by Sandpebble
            The man was a trained police professional... what happened to him I'm sure has happened to many in their first combat experience .....

            how do you think our school teachers will fair after their week long training course ?
            the difference between a man and a coward is when your balls suck up into your guts in fear, a man will still act. when someone is gunning down kids in a classroom and you have the ability to do something about it, its time to man up, especially if your a police officer!

            Comment

            • togor
              Banned
              • Nov 2009
              • 17610

              #7
              This goes to validate the anger of the kids who took fire.

              CH the NRA takes heat because their social agenda is to turn the US into an armed camp. Gee, what's not to love in that?

              Comment

              • Sandpebble
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2017
                • 2196

                #8
                Originally posted by leftyo
                the difference between a man and a coward is when your balls suck up into your guts in fear, a man will still act. when someone is gunning down kids in a classroom and you have the ability to do something about it, its time to man up, especially if your a police officer!
                Half the teachers are women ... is that non PC ?... saying that ?

                Comment

                • blackhawknj
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2011
                  • 3754

                  #9
                  And many a green soldier has been punished for cowardice, either formally or by his peers. The idea of training is to teach people how to react.

                  Comment

                  • clintonhater
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2015
                    • 5220

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Sandpebble
                    The man was a trained police professional...
                    What does that have to do with not being a coward? Most police killings of unarmed civilians are due directly to the cop's cowardice, & the panic it engenders.

                    Comment

                    • leftyo

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Sandpebble
                      Half the teachers are women ... is that non PC ?... saying that ?
                      really your that sad that you have to make this sexist. you can go ahead and woman up if it suits you!

                      Comment

                      • aintright
                        Senior Member
                        • Jun 2012
                        • 1564

                        #12
                        Originally posted by togor
                        This goes to validate the anger of the kids who took fire.

                        CH the NRA takes heat because their social agenda is to turn the US into an armed camp. Gee, what's not to love in that?
                        Seems to me your reasoning is a lot of the problem . The time has come full blown to fight back . These jack asses doing the shooting are shooting setting ducks , see how they fair under returned fire . Hell , it's worth a shot , instead of just throwing in the towel . The shooters aren't well trained , just assholes taking advantage of easy pickings .
                        But , I will agree the average teacher ain't the best bet , but a determined teacher might make difference .
                        Personally think it should be left to well trained personnel and as said by Wayne la Pierre , if political , rich , and the Hollywood elite really care about the children , give up their security to pay for the kids security . If they try to tell us unarmed security won't make a difference , then why do they waste thier and our money on it ?
                        Because even the crazies consider getting thier asses snuffed before thier agenda plays out as a turd in thier pudding .
                        Kenneth

                        Comment

                        • togor
                          Banned
                          • Nov 2009
                          • 17610

                          #13
                          The NRA's prescription is more violence. That is a factual observation. Now we can say it's good violence, like our national reaction to the Nazis or the NKs in the mid 20th century, but the argument there is to willingly describe the homeland in the terms of a war zone.

                          If the anti-gunners are handed by default the counter-argument of non-violence, this gives them considerable long term advantage. Why? Because in the long run, non-violence methods are shown in human beings to better attract allies. Lose the independents, and a small, isolated pro-gun minority is exposed.

                          Make no mistake, I want to keep what I have, which includes some "evil" guns. My view us that we secure this by defusing tensions with the broader population and scientifically reducing the number of incidents, not by stubbornly refusing to re-assess a changing landscape.

                          Comment

                          • leftyo

                            #14
                            Originally posted by togor
                            The NRA's prescription is more violence. That is a factual observation. Now we can say it's good violence, like our national reaction to the Nazis or the NKs in the mid 20th century, but the argument there is to willingly describe the homeland in the terms of a war zone.

                            If the anti-gunners are handed by default the counter-argument of non-violence, this gives them considerable long term advantage. Why? Because in the long run, non-violence methods are shown in human beings to better attract allies. Lose the independents, and a small, isolated pro-gun minority is exposed.

                            Make no mistake, I want to keep what I have, which includes some "evil" guns. My view us that we secure this by defusing tensions with the broader population and scientifically reducing the number of incidents, not by stubbornly refusing to re-assess a changing landscape.
                            i dont think the prescription is more violence, i think its more of a physical deterrent. though even if it comes to actual violence, better the violence be directed at a mass murder than unarmed, innocent children sitting in a class room. since the israeli's have sort of made this work, we can look at them and see that they just dont have attacks on schools since they installed armed teachers. so, you could look at it as reducing violence. of course in the end its all semantics geared at pleasing whatever stance you take.

                            Comment

                            • p246
                              Senior Member
                              • Mar 2013
                              • 2216

                              #15
                              He will have to live with it. No one knows how they will act til it hits the fan. Happens to cops, members of the military, etc etc. Most active shooters historically kill themselves as soon as they are pressured. It would be interesting to know if the local LE agency subscribes to minimum two person teams. Active shooter response has had to evolve. After Columbine it was four person elements. That evolved into two, as time is only on the shooters side. This has partially evolved into first on scene engages on their own. However there is still push back to that. Personally I subscribe to that. Two main reasons, as stated historically A.S. Kill themselves when pressured which ends the killing, two I would like to think it would be better to go down fighting and buy some time then live with knowing I did nothing. There are plenty of examples where SROs or first arriving street cops have engage A.S. Unfortunately it looks like this is not one of them.

                              Comment

                              Working...