Trump & Bump Stocks
Collapse
X
-
I see absolutely no use for a custom pistol box. Should we ban them, too?
Just becouse you see no use for something does not mean it should be banned.
I think that bum stocks are inaccurate toys - but then I think that caliber .50 or higher pistols, and pistol braces that can be shouldered, are pretty worthless (to me) as well. Do I think they should be banned? No.
- - - Updated - - -
Let's think this through. The ATF says that if you have the parts that, when installed, make a "machine gun", then you have a de facto machine gun.Perhaps now they will have to redefine things while opening up another can of worms. Can't use the term "bump stock" because it leaves too many detours to get around. Use the term "devices" and you outlaw bungee cords and rubber bands.
It's going to take some carefully thought out wording and definitions.
So we should not allow people to have rubber bands or bungees if they have a semi-automatic rifle? Seems silly, doesn't it.Last edited by steelap; 03-01-2018, 03:17.Comment
-
Yes, both are silly and I see you are indeed thinkingLet's think this through. The ATF says that if you have the parts that, when installed, make a "machine gun", then you have a de facto machine gun.
So we should not allow people to have rubber bands or bungees if they have a semi-automatic rifle? Seems silly, doesn't it.
2016 Chicago Cubs. MLB Champions!
**Never quite as old as the other old farts**Comment

Comment