What is the difference between a whore and a porn star???

[Sandpebble]

Come on smarty pants where is the proof Trump bought anything . THERE AIN'T NONE...

Oh yeah... Trumps Lawyer took it upon himself to part with 130 Large ... on Trumps behalf .... and you need what? ... proof ?...... heheheh ... no, I meant LOLOLOL

[clintonhater]

She seems to understand what she's gotten herself into.

What she understands, or rather, has been MADE to understand by her Democratic string-pullers, is that there's a LOT more dough to be squeezed out of Trump; or that, even if the extortion plot fails, her "friends" will make up the difference.

[togor]

What she understands, or rather, has been MADE to understand by her Democratic string-pullers, is that there's a LOT more dough to be squeezed out of Trump; or that, even if the extortion plot fails, her "friends" will make up the difference.

Maybe. But if so, again....improving the value of one's brand is pretty much a constitutional right now, yes? Or is Trump the only one allowed to do the squeezing?

[Mark in Ottawa]

Somehow I have a problem with the fact that this is the biggest story in the news. Surely there are more important issues than a politician's sex life. Really the only person who should be concerned is Mrs Trump. But then I suppose that the story is somewhat titillating (or perhaps it is totally titillating given how well endowed she is)

[leftyo]

Somehow I have a problem with the fact that this is the biggest story in the news. Surely there are more important issues than a politician's sex life. Really the only person who should be concerned is Mrs Trump. But then I suppose that the story is somewhat titillating (or perhaps it is totally titillating given how well endowed she is)

the left is running out of steam with the collusion bs, and will use anything they can get to keep stirring crap. this is between Trump and his wife. the liberals really never had a problem with infideltiy when its on their side.

[blackhawknj]

Again, times, places, dates . Like all these lurid stories about misconduct in the White House, long on the salaciousness, mighty short on the hard facts.

[leftyo]

Again, times, laces, dates . Like all these lurid stories about misconduct in the White House, long on the salaciousness, mighty short on the hard facts.

there's pretty solid evidence against billy clinton!

[clintonhater]

Somehow I have a problem with the fact that this is the biggest story in the news.

If you believe that, then CLEARLY you don't pollute your mind with very much American TV. In our hard left mainstream media, NO story short of war with N. Korea or China is more important than the latest accusations against Trump. Even the BBC so-called "World News" leads almost every broadcast with the latest Trump scandal!

What about Turkey's war on our allies the Kurds? What about China's attempts to annex a major part of international waters? What about...forget all that! Nothing is more important in the US media than Trump-bashing!

[togor]

Why knock it, CH? Turning the presidency into a tabloid-reality-show is what put Trump in the White House! You'd rather have "Washington Week in Review" Hillary? Trump himself subscribes to the theory that there is no such thing as bad publicity. He likes the churn, the fighting, the publicity, in no small part because it keeps you riled up.

[m1ashooter]

I read the key points of her interview this morning. Two people having a one night stand, years later maybe a threat to keep quiet and some cash to be quiet. Sounds like business as usual for rich people.

[S.A. Boggs]

I read the key points of her interview this morning. Two people having a one night stand, years later maybe a threat to keep quiet and some cash to be quiet. Sounds like business as usual for rich people.

People of wealth/fame have always been distinct from the rest of us. Let's look at this situation from a different angle. Said businesswoman offered for sale a service for a given sum of money. A businessman liked the service and purchased the contract of service that was offered and paid in full. Said businessman then offered a contract of silence to the businesswoman and she accepted the contract and was paid in full for this additional service. Now said businesswoman wants to return the fee, cancel the 2nd contract in hopes of many new contracts and increased financial remuneration. Said businessman does not want fee returned and contract voided and will sue to enforce contract. Now in this case who is the wronged party?
Sam

[togor]

I'm no lawyer Sam but the one working for Daniels says the contract wasn't properly executed. Who is wronged? Daniels, by her former representatives, if they gave her bad advice. Trump, by Cohen, if he gave him sloppy service.

[leftyo]

Why knock it, CH? Turning the presidency into a tabloid-reality-show is what put Trump in the White House! You'd rather have "Washington Week in Review" Hillary? Trump himself subscribes to the theory that there is no such thing as bad publicity. He likes the churn, the fighting, the publicity, in no small part because it keeps you riled up.

if you really believe what you wrote, your ignorant beyond belief!

[togor]

if you really believe what you wrote, your ignorant beyond belief!

Your head is in the sand or up somewhere else if you think that what I wrote isn't true. You've learned nothing from watching him work all these years. Trump understands you leftyo in many aspects far better than you know yourself.

[leftyo]

Your head is in the sand or up somewhere else if you think that what I wrote isn't true. You've learned nothing from watching him work all these years. Trump understands you leftyo in many aspects far better than you know yourself.

yup, you are ignorant. the sole reason he is sitting in the whitehouse is the fact your party came up with the only woman in the country that most women wouldnt vote for! plain and simple. so now your being like red and claiming you know what trump is thinking, damn your stupid! swear to god you two are brothers!