Protesters. Don't they have jobs?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roadkingtrax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 7835

    #16
    Originally posted by Allen
    Liberals wouldn't know anything about this.
    Oops...isnt this exactly what they do? Drain all the benefits?
    "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

    Comment

    • togor
      Banned
      • Nov 2009
      • 17610

      #17
      Originally posted by JB White
      Disagree. Retirement pensions and earned Social Security benefits do not qualify as crybaby handouts. Both were worked for and paid into as a goal for later in life.
      JB, it's called Social Security, and is a tax-based program put in place as part of Roosevelt's New Deal. Most collect much more than they put in, especially since people quit smoking so much. You can point to some aspect of program organization and say that makes all the difference in the world, that it isn't a free handout. But it is welfare for old people, paid for by young people. It's a government run wealth transfer operation from age demographics with less wealth to those with more.

      Comment

      • clintonhater
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2015
        • 5220

        #18
        Originally posted by togor
        But it is welfare for old people, paid for by young people.
        You mean then that there's some justice in this humbug, PC, world?

        Comment

        • togor
          Banned
          • Nov 2009
          • 17610

          #19
          Originally posted by clintonhater
          You mean then that there's some justice in this humbug, PC, world?
          If you want to call it that, then fine. But what you are saying is that there is at least one liberal social program that you agree with. To which one could ask: just the one program? And the answer is no: Medicare too! We socialize old age in this country. If you can survive the Darwinian gauntlet of the first sixty plus years, then you can nuzzle in the busom if Mother Government through your golden years. Odd but true. I think a good idea would be to make voting contingent on not receiving government assistance, including old age assistance, with a health care exemption.

          Comment

          • RED
            Very Senior Member - OFC
            • Aug 2009
            • 11689

            #20
            Originally posted by JB White
            Disagree. Retirement pensions and earned Social Security benefits do not qualify as crybaby handouts. Both were worked for and paid into as a goal for later in life.

            They say SS recipients get back way more than they pay in. In 1958 when I started "paying in," my dollar was worth a hell of a lot more than it is now. For example a ounce of gold was $36, a coke and a hot dog down at the Dog Shack was $.05, lean ground beef was 4/lbs for $, a like new 1903A3 was $15 and a good condition 5 year old used Chevy car was $100. So do you actually get more or is it just a bigger number?

            Comment

            • Bill D
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2009
              • 2568

              #21
              Social security was a “New Deal” handout from the socialist administration of king FDR. Working people weren’t in favor of it then and still aren’t. My dad always said that if the government would just let him keep his SS taxes, he could invest it much better by himself. I feel the same but since the government still refuses to allow me to invest my own money, I damned well intend to draw every bit that I legally can. And, SS wouldn’t be on such a fast track to destruction if not for the present “new dealers” that togor so admires.
              "A generation which ignores history has no past and no future." - Jean Boden

              "In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: It goes on."
              -- Robert Frost

              Comment

              • S.A. Boggs
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2009
                • 8568

                #22
                Originally posted by Bill D
                Social security was a “New Deal” handout from the socialist administration of king FDR. Working people weren’t in favor of it then and still aren’t. My dad always said that if the government would just let him keep his SS taxes, he could invest it much better by himself. I feel the same but since the government still refuses to allow me to invest my own money, I damned well intend to draw every bit that I legally can. And, SS wouldn’t be on such a fast track to destruction if not for the present “new dealers” that togor so admires.
                Yea, but without that $$$ how could the Socialists buy the votes of illegals?
                Sam

                Comment

                • Vern Humphrey
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 15875

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Bill D
                  Social security was a “New Deal” handout from the socialist administration of king FDR. Working people weren’t in favor of it then and still aren’t. My dad always said that if the government would just let him keep his SS taxes, he could invest it much better by himself. I feel the same but since the government still refuses to allow me to invest my own money, I damned well intend to draw every bit that I legally can. And, SS wouldn’t be on such a fast track to destruction if not for the present “new dealers” that togor so admires.
                  Let me tell you a story. After I retired from the Army, I went to work for a small company that got bought, sold, etc. Finally, it became part of a large company that had a 401k. I put the max in that 401k for a little over 10 years before retiring for good.

                  Note that while I was putting 15% of my income in the 401k I was ALSO involuntarily putting 15.3% into Social Security. (That includes the "Employer's Contribution" -- which is money I earned.)

                  Now I have to take Required Minimum Distribution from that 401k. And my RMD is $3,000 a year MORE than my Social Security AND my wife's Social Security combined!

                  Imagine where I'd be if I'd been allowed to KEEP and invest what Social Security took from me!

                  Comment

                  • Allen
                    Moderator
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 10583

                    #24
                    Same here Vern. I worked for large corporation for 19 years. Our 401K plan was company matched for the first 2%. The plan was mostly company stock with most contributing about 10%. After 25 years with the stock splits and dividends plus the weekly contributions you could retire with a 7 figure nest egg or close to it.

                    Comment

                    • Bill D
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 2568

                      #25
                      Also, if I remember correctly, social security was supposed to be put into a separate account to only be used for social security. Then the politicos discovered that great big account . . . .
                      "A generation which ignores history has no past and no future." - Jean Boden

                      "In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: It goes on."
                      -- Robert Frost

                      Comment

                      • sid
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 3198

                        #26
                        Yes. It was supposed to be in a "lock box" and it was that way until Lyndon Johnson decided to steal from it.

                        Comment

                        • dogtag
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2009
                          • 14985

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Bill D
                          Also, if I remember correctly, social security was supposed to be put into a separate account to only be used for social security. Then the politicos discovered that great big account . . . .
                          There isn't a lock box, safe or vault that a liberal couldn't break into,
                          assuming he or she knew there was somebody else's money inside.
                          And don't think it's safe under your mattress either.

                          Comment

                          • S.A. Boggs
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 8568

                            #28
                            Originally posted by dogtag
                            There isn't a lock box, safe or vault that a liberal couldn't break into,
                            assuming he or she knew there was somebody else's money inside.
                            And don't think it's safe under your mattress either.
                            Sorry, "they" stole the mattress too.
                            Sam

                            Comment

                            • RETREAD123456
                              Member
                              • May 2015
                              • 50

                              #29
                              They. are mostly shills for the Left and and other NEW WORLD ORDER. types

                              Comment

                              • RED
                                Very Senior Member - OFC
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 11689

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                                Let me tell you a story. After I retired from the Army, I went to work for a small company that got bought, sold, etc. Finally, it became part of a large company that had a 401k. I put the max in that 401k for a little over 10 years before retiring for good.

                                Note that while I was putting 15% of my income in the 401k I was ALSO involuntarily putting 15.3% into Social Security. (That includes the "Employer's Contribution" -- which is money I earned.)

                                Now I have to take Required Minimum Distribution from that 401k. And my RMD is $3,000 a year MORE than my Social Security AND my wife's Social Security combined!

                                Imagine where I'd be if I'd been allowed to KEEP and invest what Social Security took from me!
                                Of course you understand that the lefties think everybody else is irresponsible and would have spent their money on cigarettes and whiskey. Togor and his BFF crowd knows everything and they have to guide everybody or else they will starve.

                                He is so smart and so telepathic he knows the Powerball Lottery numbers weeks before they are drawn.
                                Last edited by RED; 07-07-2018, 03:50.

                                Comment

                                Working...