Maybe an IQ test before gun purchase ? ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dogtag
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 14985

    #1

    Maybe an IQ test before gun purchase ? ...

    I'm kidding of course, but maybe they should at least
    be introduced to the protocols; i.e. Always treat a gun
    as loaded. Never point at anybody - etc. Maybe a few
    children's lives could be saved. But I guess stupid is
    something that can't be cured.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...aning-gun.html

    As far as I'm concerned he should be charged with manslaughter.
  • 1563621
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 1103

    #2
    I purchased an 03a3 about 7-8 years ago. Had it transferred from an FFL to my 01 FFL. When I went to pick up I naturally went to clear and low and behold what pops out?
    Friggin thing was loaded! Go figure, Should have been cleared 3X before I touched it. 1-when shipped,2-when received, and 3 when handed to me for inspection.

    Comment

    • barretcreek
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2013
      • 6065

      #3
      When I was in HS a detective accidentally killed his wife while cleaning his revolver....

      Comment

      • clintonhater
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2015
        • 5220

        #4
        Originally posted by barretcreek
        When I was in HS a detective accidentally killed his wife while cleaning his revolver....
        Stupid or...very clever? Depends on how he felt about his wife.

        Comment

        • Mark in Ottawa
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 1744

          #5
          I have mentioned this before but I think that the Canadian system should be adopted for use in the USA. In Canada, before you can obtain a firearms permit, you have to take a training course on firearms knowledge and safety and then pass both a written exam and a practical handling exam. At this time, to get a basic permit for non-restricted firearms (basically rifles and shotguns) the course takes one day - not a particularly onerous requirement but at least it ensures that everybody understands firearms safety. Of course, in addition to the exams there is a routine criminal records check and a requirement for two references who will attest to your sanity. Once you have the permit, however, there is no waiting period and there are no limits on how many non-restricted firearms you can own. With a population of about 37 million, there are about 10 million firearms in private hands so the requirements seem to be pretty reasonable.

          Comment

          • barretcreek
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2013
            • 6065

            #6
            Mark,
            All very nice but your pols don't have guilty consciences and a well earned fear their constituents.

            Comment

            • JB White
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 13371

              #7
              I just renewed my Illinois FOID online via the State Police website. Long process with plenty of questions and cross referencing. Need to beware of uppercase/lowercase entries. 85% of the way you need to upload a photo they can compare to the one on your Illinois DL or state issued ID card. Has to be in accordance with their instructions so no typical candids or selfies. Passport type with a plain, light colored background etc.

              I passed my gun owners IQ test.
              2016 Chicago Cubs. MLB Champions!


              **Never quite as old as the other old farts**

              Comment

              • Vern Humphrey
                Administrator - OFC
                • Aug 2009
                • 15875

                #8
                I have pointed out many times -- training is a solution. Before touting a solution, you should have a problem. And there ought to be some sort of relation between problem and proposed solution.

                Now we have states with Constitutional Carry and states with stringent training requirements. And no one has shown any difference between the states with no training and those with stringent training in regard to accidents.

                Comment

                • Allen
                  Moderator
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 10627

                  #9
                  There should be an IQ test to vote. You would never see another democrat in office again.

                  Comment

                  • Roadkingtrax
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 7835

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Allen
                    There should be an IQ test to vote. You would never see another democrat in office again.
                    And a cap on age. Restrictions should be set against those for which voting has the least consequence. If you draw civil benefits of any kind you are not allowed to vote.
                    "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                    Comment

                    • togor
                      Banned
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 17610

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Allen
                      There should be an IQ test to vote. You would never see another democrat in office again.
                      And Allen would have one less thing to do on Tuesdays in November.

                      Comment

                      • Vern Humphrey
                        Administrator - OFC
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 15875

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Allen
                        There should be an IQ test to vote. You would never see another democrat in office again.
                        Merely requiring a photo ID -- to prove you're the person you claim to be and an actual citizen -- would go a long way toward that goal.

                        Comment

                        • bostonbound
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2013
                          • 184

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Mark in Ottawa
                          I have mentioned this before but I think that the Canadian system should be adopted for use in the USA. In Canada, before you can obtain a firearms permit, ....
                          Fortunately, there are parts of the United States that are still free, and you need no permit to purchase or own a gun.

                          Unfortunately, this is yet another example of why Canada is not a free country.

                          Comment

                          • Vern Humphrey
                            Administrator - OFC
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 15875

                            #14
                            And the prime reason why, if Quebec declares independence, the other Canadian provinces are NOT going to be offered statehood.

                            Comment

                            • dogtag
                              Senior Member
                              • Sep 2009
                              • 14985

                              #15
                              Originally posted by barretcreek
                              When I was in HS a detective accidentally killed his wife while cleaning his revolver....
                              There's no way I'd believe an accidental discharge of a revolver.
                              Sounds like murder to me.
                              What happened in the case ?

                              Comment

                              Working...