Roundhouse kicker finally charged

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rkohut
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 1115

    #1

    Roundhouse kicker finally charged

    Eight counts of assault and seven counts of mischief under $5,000. Charges include other previous incidents.

    There are also more videos of him assaulting women included in the link below;

    A man allegedly caught on viral video doing a roundhouse kick and striking a woman in the shoulder during an anti-abortion rally, knocking her phone out of her hand…
  • leftyo

    #2
    whats even harder to believe is that there wasnt a real man that would step in and handle this fruitloop.

    Comment

    • Vern Humphrey
      Administrator - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 15875

      #3
      And even harder to believe is that there are people on this forum who will not condemn what he did.

      Comment

      • barretcreek
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2013
        • 6065

        #4
        Is there a right to self defense in Canada? I know in U.K. the law basically requires one to thank their assailant.

        Comment

        • Mark in Ottawa
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 1744

          #5
          Barretcreek; As I understand things, in Canada, you can defend yourself but the level of force applied has to be proportional to the situation and the risk. If someone grabs your protest sign, you really can't take another sign and belt him unconscious with the stick even the jerk deserves it. In practice however, no matter what the risk, you really have to be in deadly danger before you use a firearm. The police will almost automatically charge you with something (at least a charge of improper storage of a firearm) if you do use a gun. They are firm believers in the concept of calling the police rather than taking on someone yourself.

          Comment

          • leftyo

            #6
            Originally posted by Mark in Ottawa
            Barretcreek; As I understand things, in Canada, you can defend yourself but the level of force applied has to be proportional to the situation and the risk. If someone grabs your protest sign, you really can't take another sign and belt him unconscious with the stick even the jerk deserves it. In practice however, no matter what the risk, you really have to be in deadly danger before you use a firearm. The police will almost automatically charge you with something (at least a charge of improper storage of a firearm) if you do use a gun. They are firm believers in the concept of calling the police rather than taking on someone yourself.
            it sure wouldnt have taken a gun to beat this fruitloop senseless.

            Comment

            • barretcreek
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2013
              • 6065

              #7
              Mark,
              Thank you. My take is my 102 year old mother has to react proportionately to a 225 lb 6'2" 17 year old thug. If she had a gun she wouldn't have the reactions to use it. Here in Colorado we have two statutes. A) Make my day. No explanation needed. B) Make my neighbor's day. Passed after a (retired or not LE) saw a guy climbing in his neighbor's window. Last time the PoS did that.
              Calling the cops after you are dead just doesn't cut it. Maybe in Canada the police show up each time every time but here it depends on the Zip code. And sometimes who can blame them the way the neighbors react. Better to call the coroner.

              And maybe Tough Guy will meet a Special Friend.

              Comment

              • Vern Humphrey
                Administrator - OFC
                • Aug 2009
                • 15875

                #8
                When someone says, "The police will protect you," just get a copy of the newspaper and ask, "Why didn't the police protect this guy? And this gal? And this guy?"

                Comment

                • blackhawknj
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2011
                  • 3754

                  #9
                  A typical Leftist-Freedom of Speech for me but not for Thee. Will the feminists with all their quacking about "Violence against Women" weigh in on this ?

                  Comment

                  • Vern Humphrey
                    Administrator - OFC
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 15875

                    #10
                    Of course not, no more than their male cohorts on this forum could bring themselves to condemn this despicable act.

                    Comment

                    • JB White
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 13371

                      #11
                      Originally posted by rkohut
                      Eight counts of assault and seven counts of mischief under $5,000. Charges include other previous incidents.

                      Makes me "feel all warm and tingly" when one of my predictions comes true. From the other thread on the topic:

                      Originally posted by JB White
                      He will be arrested as she intends to press charges. It's an ongoing investigation and the police are still gathering details. Others are asked to come forward as well. He's got a number of damage to property and assault charges coming should others decide to pursue the matter.
                      Makes me feel like predicting who will be our next President, but I may have to actually think about that one.
                      2016 Chicago Cubs. MLB Champions!


                      **Never quite as old as the other old farts**

                      Comment

                      • togor
                        Banned
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 17610

                        #12
                        JB I'd think you'd want to use your powers of foresight to divine something important like the Cubs next World Series crown.

                        Comment

                        • Bill D
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2009
                          • 2568

                          #13
                          Looks like both the Cubbies and the Rockies will get to watch the rest of the season from the sidelines. Only difference being that the Cubbies already grabbed the best seats.

                          Oh Well, as the say in Rockiesland - wait until next year!
                          "A generation which ignores history has no past and no future." - Jean Boden

                          "In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: It goes on."
                          -- Robert Frost

                          Comment

                          • dogtag
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 14985

                            #14
                            You can always ask the mugger to wait twenty minutes or so
                            so that the Police can arrive and arrest him. Maybe a cup of
                            coffee and breakfast might do the trick.

                            Comment

                            • S.A. Boggs
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 8568

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Mark in Ottawa
                              Barretcreek; As I understand things, in Canada, you can defend yourself but the level of force applied has to be proportional to the situation and the risk. If someone grabs your protest sign, you really can't take another sign and belt him unconscious with the stick even the jerk deserves it. In practice however, no matter what the risk, you really have to be in deadly danger before you use a firearm. The police will almost automatically charge you with something (at least a charge of improper storage of a firearm) if you do use a gun. They are firm believers in the concept of calling the police rather than taking on someone yourself.
                              In the United States it is similar and we have an added bonus. About twenty five years ago our Supreme Court handed down a ruling that the police are under no obligation to protect the average individual only government or business entities. Here is also the kicker, a person being held in protective custody is entitled to police protection. No where is the average person entitled to protection, only the general welfare of the nation. This is correct as it goes back to the nation's earlies days of an individual protecting themselves and theirs. Problem is that many prosecutors don't see it that way.
                              Sam

                              Comment

                              Working...