National Shrine of Sodomy created in (of course) DC.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • clintonhater
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2015
    • 5220

    #16
    Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
    The Catholic position is that we do not condemn homosexuals, but consider homosexual acts to be wrong. It's no sin to have same-sex attraction, but to act on that attraction is wrong -- just like acting on a violent temper, a propensity for binge drinking, taking drugs and so on and so on is not wrong -- but acting out those impulses is.
    Exactly! No pedophile asked or studied to be cursed with that risky propensity--they were "born that way." Yet society demands that they restrain their impulses, & punishes them severely if they don't!

    Comment

    • blackhawknj
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 3754

      #17
      And of course, those who say a person's sexual orientation has no bearing on their job performance, it's a "private matter"-do you approve of pedophilia ?

      Comment

      • clintonhater
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2015
        • 5220

        #18
        Originally posted by togor
        Apologist? I'd need to see a link or two to posts of mine demonstrating that.
        Your regular & consistent defense of public exhibitions of faggot behavior is a clear & obvious demonstration of that fact.

        Comment

        • clintonhater
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2015
          • 5220

          #19
          Originally posted by togor
          More broadly however you take a stand against individual liberty.
          That's right--I'm such an extremist I don't think people should be allowed to yell fire in a theater either. I'd go so far as to say a man should probably be prohibited from beating his wife, or at least his dog. But what really galls me is that my town won't allow me to shoot in my back yard--an outrageous supression of my individual liberty!

          Comment

          • togor
            Banned
            • Nov 2009
            • 17610

            #20
            CH, here is something I believe. The times being what they are, someone who follows this forum has come to terms with the fact that they have a kid or grandkid who is gay. They nonetheless chose love and family over separation from flesh and blood. And if forced to choose between your kind or mine gaining dictatorial power over the country, they'd choose mine in a heartbeat. Why? Because your kind would throw their loved-one into a reeducation camp just for being caught holding hands with someone in a park. Your intolerance knows no bounds. I have no problems, to use the old expression, calling you a spade on this subject.

            And now that one reader knows that at least one other person here thinks they made the right choice, for whatever that is worth.
            Last edited by togor; 10-14-2018, 03:54.

            Comment

            • clintonhater
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2015
              • 5220

              #21
              Originally posted by togor
              Because your kind would throw their loved-one into a reeducation camp just for being caught holding hands with someone in a park.
              It's my park too. Why must I & others who don't share your endorsement of sexual depravity be forced to leave the park or endure the sight of such a repellent exhibition? They don't have homes or private quarters of some kind? Of course, in any big city park, hand-holding would be the very least of the degenerate behavior on display.

              Comment

              • togor
                Banned
                • Nov 2009
                • 17610

                #22
                Originally posted by clintonhater
                It's my park too. Why must I ... be forced to leave the park or endure the sight of such a repellent exhibition?
                Because you don't get to decide for everyone what the rules are. I know that sucks for you but there it is. Gays, mixed race couples, who knows how long your list is, but I doubt it ends after those two. As an alternative, you could just grow up and not let what other people do on their own time bother you so much. Any chance of that?

                Comment

                • dogtag
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 14985

                  #23
                  Any group that's in the Press limelight and popular with the democrats is going
                  to attract the weirdos simply because it's the "in thing". If it's cool to be queer or
                  transsexual then I can easily imagine those same weirdos saying hey, count me in.

                  Comment

                  • togor
                    Banned
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 17610

                    #24
                    Originally posted by dogtag
                    Any group that's in the Press limelight and popular with the democrats is going
                    to attract the weirdos simply because it's the "in thing". If it's cool to be queer or
                    transsexual then ... hey, count me in.
                    Editing is fun sometimes.

                    Comment

                    • clintonhater
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2015
                      • 5220

                      #25
                      Originally posted by togor
                      As an alternative, you could just grow up and not let what other people do on their own time bother you so much. Any chance of that?
                      Hell, no, not when they do it in such a way that I can't avoid observing it. Of course, that's exactly their intention--to FORCE the public to acknowledge them like it or not! Isn't that the whole point of "Gay Pride" parades? To rub their depravity in the face of the straight (i.e., normal) world? You're a fool or a flagrant liar if you deny it.

                      Comment

                      • clintonhater
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2015
                        • 5220

                        #26
                        Originally posted by dogtag
                        If it's cool to be queer or transsexual [n.b., trans-FREAK is the correct terminology] then I can easily imagine those same weirdos saying hey, count me in.
                        MAKING it cool is one of the foremost objectives of the media & entertainment industry, & they are absolutely tireless in promoting that depraved agenda.
                        Last edited by clintonhater; 10-14-2018, 07:00.

                        Comment

                        • blackhawknj
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2011
                          • 3754

                          #27
                          A conservative commentator from NJ, the late Allen Caruba, said of the LGBTQ crowd:
                          "They're in love with their sexuality."
                          A letter writer to the New York Post said of a gay pride parade:
                          "They're people with a pornographic outlook on life."
                          Hey, PC Crowd-doesn't the "Right not to be Offended" apply to US ?

                          Comment

                          • Vern Humphrey
                            Administrator - OFC
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 15875

                            #28
                            Originally posted by blackhawknj
                            A conservative commentator from NJ, the late Allen Caruba, said of the LGBTQ crowd:
                            "They're in love with their sexuality."
                            A letter writer to the New York Post said of a gay pride parade:
                            "They're people with a pornographic outlook on life."
                            Hey, PC Crowd-doesn't the "Right not to be Offended" apply to US ?
                            Of course not! We're regular and under the Facist concept of the Corporate State, we have no rights.

                            Comment

                            • Allen
                              Moderator
                              • Sep 2009
                              • 10583

                              #29
                              Sodomy. Perhaps this is how togor was conceived. It sure would explain a lot.

                              Comment

                              • Roadkingtrax
                                Senior Member
                                • Feb 2010
                                • 7835

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Allen
                                Sodomy. Perhaps this is how togor was conceived. It sure would explain a lot.
                                It doesn't work that way. Christians don't allow it.
                                "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                                Comment

                                Working...