Maybe Pocahontas really is Pocahontas

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Allen
    Moderator
    • Sep 2009
    • 10583

    #1

    Maybe Pocahontas really is Pocahontas

    Maybe Elizabeth Warren really does have native Indian blood heritage or maybe this report is as real as obama's computer generated birth certificate but in any case it will probably stick.

    All the more reason to call her Pocahontas.

    The results point to "strong evidence" that she had a Native American ancestor six to 10 generations ago, according to an expert.
  • Vern Humphrey
    Administrator - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 15875

    #2
    She claims to be Cherokee -- anyone with any knowledge of American Indians would never do that. The Cherokee are unique -- they have their own system of writing, and have detailed records. They can refute false claims in a heart beat!

    Comment

    • togor
      Banned
      • Nov 2009
      • 17610

      #3
      Don't think the term bothers her much, or her supporters. And maybe Allen could get his DNA tested to confirm what the family Bible says about his aunt also being his half-sister.

      Comment

      • clintonhater
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2015
        • 5220

        #4
        Originally posted by togor
        Don't think the term bothers her much, or her supporters.
        No doubt, as all the evidence of her life-long pattern of lying never bothered members of the Hillary cult. Just heard one member of that cult, a CNN reporter ("April"--what a name for a woman with that ugly bulldog face!), claim she had NEVER HEARD of Hillary disbelieving or maligning the women who had accused her husband!!!

        Comment

        • m1ashooter
          Senior Member
          • May 2011
          • 3220

          #5
          I don't care what she is as long as she represents the people of Mass and not me.
          To Error Is Human To Forgive Is Not SAC Policy

          Comment

          • JB White
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 13371

            #6
            Real report or not. Someone may have jumped the fence 10 generations ago so I surely wouldn't call that a heritage.
            What does it take to be legally part American Indian? 1/4 or 1/8th? I don't think 1/200th matters. A flyspeck in a snowball.
            2016 Chicago Cubs. MLB Champions!


            **Never quite as old as the other old farts**

            Comment

            • dogtag
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2009
              • 14985

              #7
              We're all probably mongrels to one extent or another

              Comment

              • clintonhater
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2015
                • 5220

                #8
                Originally posted by dogtag
                We're all probably mongrels to one extent or another
                And now, sadly, not even the Royal Family can consider itself exempt. But the extent of the mongrelization still makes a huge difference!

                Comment

                • RED
                  Very Senior Member - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 11689

                  #9
                  It is just another Democrat scam. My 1/2 sister is into the ancestry.com thing DNA thing and Ancestry.com just happened to update their "findings." Now me and my 1/2 sister and millions of others that have had their DNA tested now have 1% American Indian both North and South American Indian DNA including Warren.

                  Here are the NEW findings for my sister...


                  Norway
                  4%
                  Refined from:
                  Scandinavia 9%
                  Native American—North, Central, South NEW
                  1%
                  Migrations
                  Tennessee & Southern States Settlers
                  West Tennessee, Western Kentucky & Virginia-North Carolina Piedmont Settlers
                  Northern Arkansas & Middle Tennessee Settlers
                  Arkansas River Valley Settlers
                  Lower Midwest & Virginia Settlers
                  Missouri Ozarks & East Tennessee Settlers
                  Western North Carolina Settlers
                  Western North Carolina & North Georgia Settlers
                  North Carolina Blue Ridge Mountains Settlers
                  Last edited by RED; 10-15-2018, 10:02.

                  Comment

                  • dave
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 6778

                    #10
                    Hardly conclusive! Report: "strong evidence", "suggests 6-10 generations ago", 'if Great, Great, Great grandmother was native Amer. she would be 1/32. At 10 generations she would be 1/1,024'. Report also states "she may be less then average American"

                    All the ad's you see for DNA tests seem to show a lot of people with native Amer. blood and also African. Me thinks they have an agenda!
                    Last edited by dave; 10-15-2018, 10:53.
                    You can never go home again.

                    Comment

                    • Vern Humphrey
                      Administrator - OFC
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 15875

                      #11
                      They also leave your DNA on file to be shared with who knows who.

                      Comment

                      • leftyo

                        #12
                        Originally posted by dave
                        Hardly conclusive! Report: "strong evidence", "suggests 6-10 generations ago", 'if Great, Great, Great grandmother was native Amer. she would be 1/32. At 10 generations she would be 1/1,024'. Report also states "she may be less then average American"

                        All the ad's you see for DNA tests seem to show a lot of people with native Amer. blood and also African. Me thinks they have an agenda!
                        thats because there are no benefits being given for being of white european ancestory.

                        Comment

                        • M1Tommy
                          Very Senior Member - OFC
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 1027

                          #13
                          Dave, Spot-on there. I know that my great, great grandmother was Indian (probably Caddo, just my thoughts). I make no claims to "being Indian"..... just an American. I reckon that would be anathema to the Dim in question.

                          Tommy

                          Comment

                          • Vern Humphrey
                            Administrator - OFC
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 15875

                            #14
                            Same here. I have the story from a lady who did genealogy in the '30s and have since run into it several times from several sources.

                            There was an Irishman named Ruben Cole serving in the British Army during the Revolution. He was part of a detachment guarding a bridge in New York, and that detachment was wiped out by Patriots. Somehow, he survived (there are different versions of how) and found refuge with a family named Huyck. The husband was Dutch, the wife Mohawk. They had a daughter named Lydia who married Ruben. One of Ruben and Lydia's great-grand daughters, Caroline Elizabeth Cole was my great-grand mother.

                            Now I can trace the line through census and similar records back to Ruben and Lydia -- but not beyond them. If the story about Lydia's parents is true, that would make me 1/128th Mohawk.

                            Comment

                            • M1Tommy
                              Very Senior Member - OFC
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 1027

                              #15
                              Vern, The written records we have only say that, that particular man ancestor was "Married, to woman". It seems as though folks around those areas did not take well to his marriage, to her. I do have a portrait of them, which IMO is pretty remarkable in itself. He looks hauntingly like me (poor guy) with a rounded fedora hat and string tie and suit coat of rough materials. She is in buckskins, etc., glaring at the camera!
                              Even if records are off by a generation that'd make me 1/32nd plus whatever from other directions.... oh well. As before, I am American.


                              Tommy

                              Comment

                              Working...