AOC steals almost $1 million in campaign money...

[Vern Humphrey]

I have said it many times -- ignore them (it) and they (it) will go away.

[togor]

I have said it many times -- ignore them (it) and they (it) will go away.

You also said that tax cuts will cure the deficit by stimulating the economy more than enough to make up the difference, and that tariffs will knock down the trade deficit. How're those working out right now? Never trust a supply-sider.

[S.A. Boggs]

I have said it many times -- ignore them (it) and they (it) will go away.

Why would anyone want to reply to our "Nazi's" who are advocates for baby murdering? I was assigned to work with child molesters and I hated to do it. How can one converse with the advocates of murdering children under the guise of "rights" escapes me. I placed "them" on the quarantine list as I would not have to bear witness to their abomination!
Sam

[Vern Humphrey]

Why would anyone want to reply to our "Nazi's" who are advocates for baby murdering? I was assigned to work with child molesters and I hated to do it. How can one converse with the advocates of murdering children under the guise of "rights" escapes me. I placed "them" on the quarantine list as I would not have to bear witness to their abomination!
Sam

You and me both.

[Bodyman]

We all have such people in our lives.

I know I do, ...

You guys are the choir, ... sorry if I bored you but thanks for allowing the attempt. Hopefully you got a few chuckles out it.

Writing helps me think and I enjoy composing such indictments as they flow so easily. At least here we can form a whole sentence without getting screamed at, and it refreshing to be able to finally finish some of them for the first time. If any of it was disagreeable there was much rope with which to hang me, yet it went pretty much uncontested (and sympathetic or not, you guys would have hung me just as quickly). Of course should any of those words help when you are faced with these discussions in person, be my guest.

What caught my attention at the start was that the daft bimbo was a 'true believer in the cause', a 'cause' which certainly appears to be different than the ideals upon which this country was founded and which provided her the prosperity and position she so enjoys.

I don't think we will ever get an answer to what the 'cause' might be, because nobody wants to say it out loud. The green agenda is nothing less than using the environment (instead of 'the workers' this time) as a pretext to rearrange, (this time worldwide) all power and money, and to turn the US and most developed countries into third-world sh!tholes (and they are sh!tholes which is why the people there want to come here). These are not unintended consequences, they are actually THE plan. The 'true believers' appear to fundamentally dislike this country anyway so tearing it apart is no big deal to them - resist, which is really just hate. Nobody wants to destroy the environment, yet that is exactly how anyone who questions them is painted, which is again, more hate, ... but you guys already know all that.

Maybe it is all tilting at windmills, but I'd like to prevent the ruination of our country if possible, and if banging away on a keyboard helps shed the light of day on such insanity and stupidity, or fortifies a few others to do so as well, or if it ultimately helps even one person re-examine what they think, then I am gratified. When you get down to brass tacks, The Second Amendment was the Founding Fathers contemplating the failure of the rest of the Constitution and it is to be looked to ONLY when every other Constitutional mechanism has been completely exhausted, and not before (liberals never can grasp why the NRA is powerful - it is because NRA members are us and we call and vote - ALL of us - The Constitution tells us to, ... and congress-critters know it). No court will ever speak like this so it is up to us out here to do so. So in the end, this is all nothing more than little old me, nobody special, accessing one of those other mechanisms as best I can to help make sure that that Constitution - which I swore to uphold and defend to the best of my ability, ... doesn't fail. To make sure that this little 250 year experiment where we are each Nobility, ... doesn't end.

(and I guarantee that last part got me a special note in my file in the cubicle outside DC somewhere, ...)

AMHO Best all.

[S.A. Boggs]

I know I do, ...

You guys are the choir, ... sorry if I bored you but thanks for allowing the attempt. Hopefully you got a few chuckles out it.

Writing helps me think and I enjoy composing such indictments as they flow so easily. At least here we can form a whole sentence without getting screamed at, and it refreshing to be able to finally finish some of them for the first time. If any of it was disagreeable there was much rope with which to hang me, yet it went pretty much uncontested (and sympathetic or not, you guys would have hung me just as quickly). Of course should any of those words help when you are faced with these discussions in person, be my guest.

What caught my attention at the start was that the daft bimbo was a 'true believer in the cause', a 'cause' which certainly appears to be different than the ideals upon which this country was founded and which provided her the prosperity and position she so enjoys.

I don't think we will ever get an answer to what the 'cause' might be, because nobody wants to say it out loud. The green agenda is nothing less than using the environment (instead of 'the workers' this time) as a pretext to rearrange, (this time worldwide) all power and money, and to turn the US and most developed countries into third-world sh!tholes (and they are sh!tholes which is why the people there want to come here). These are not unintended consequences, they are actually THE plan. The 'true believers' appear to fundamentally dislike this country anyway so tearing it apart is no big deal to them - resist, which is really just hate. Nobody wants to destroy the environment, yet that is exactly how anyone who questions them is painted, which is again, more hate, ... but you guys already know all that.

Maybe it is all tilting at windmills, but I'd like to prevent the ruination of our country if possible, and if banging away on a keyboard helps shed the light of day on such insanity and stupidity, or fortifies a few others to do so as well, or if it ultimately helps even one person re-examine what they think, then I am gratified. When you get down to brass tacks, The Second Amendment was the Founding Fathers contemplating the failure of the rest of the Constitution and it is to be looked to ONLY when every other Constitutional mechanism has been completely exhausted, and not before (liberals never can grasp why the NRA is powerful - it is because NRA members are us and we call and vote - ALL of us - The Constitution tells us to, ... and congress-critters know it). No court will ever speak like this so it is up to us out here to do so. So in the end, this is all nothing more than little old me, nobody special, accessing one of those other mechanisms as best I can to help make sure that that Constitution - which I swore to uphold and defend to the best of my ability, ... doesn't fail. To make sure that this little 250 year experiment where we are each Nobility, ... doesn't end.

(and I guarantee that last part got me a special note in my file in the cubicle outside DC somewhere, ...)

AMHO Best all.

The problem is that you are trying to logically converse with a dead Missouri mule. NO matter how true and logical your statement[s] are, the Nazi's cannot and will not condone anything you say...UNLESS IT SUITS THEIR PURPOSE. Look into history at the German NSDWP and how our former Democratic Party has morphed into the NSDWP of today. America is in the stages of what Germany did in the late 1920's for comparison. "Our" Nazi's advocate the murder of babies, where is the difference in that then the systemic murder of over 6 million humans in death camps?
Sam

[Vern Humphrey]

The problem is that you are trying to logically converse with a dead Missouri mule. NO matter how true and logical your statement[s] are, the Nazi's cannot and will not condone anything you say...UNLESS IT SUITS THEIR PURPOSE. Look into history at the German NSDWP and how our former Democratic Party has morphed into the NSDWP of today. America is in the stages of what Germany did in the late 1920's for comparison. "Our" Nazi's advocate the murder of babies, where is the difference in that then the systemic murder of over 6 million humans in death camps?
Sam

As I have said before, they are narcissists. They believe reality must adjust itself to whatever they say it is. Logic simply bounces off people like that.

[Bodyman]

I'm no Charles Krauthammer, ...

I'm no Charles Krauthammer, but some of those writings are good - they are original and pretty tidy indictments of the mental sloth that is liberal thinking. If some people actually took the time read them (I know for some of them their lips would be really tired) and think about them without their shepherds telling them what to think, they might actually discover a few things about themselves. Every once in a while you get a glimmer but all too often it is just a spark on wet tinder, ... or the shepherd hooks them at the neck and throws them back in the fold.

For the libs; guys - think for yourself. It is a brave thing. Feelings are important but they do not trump logic and if you ignore logic completely you will accomplish nothing or worse, do harm. I know that is not what you want, but that is why liberalism fails, always - you cannot feel your way thru these problems. It isn't because the wrong people were in charge. So, take the warm blanket of liberalism off and come out here and explore with us. It doesn't mean you are suddenly going to wear a MAGA hat, it just means that you can disagree with someone and be wrong on occasion without the hate, and understand things from another viewpoint and that it is ok. Suddenly the world isn't the bad place that liberalism wants, actually, ... needs, ... you to see. They need it to empower themselves - and you have to GIVE them that power, ... but with any luck you will look back and understand that the hate is behind you.

Am I talking to our guys? No, probably not. Maybe a little, but more to the lunatics that are in my life. We all have them.

I liked the idea that the green causes are the new communism - the new means for overthrowing current power structures worldwide and rearranging money; taking from the rich to give to the poor, just like communists sought 100 years ago (I haven't seen any pundits throw that one out there, yet). The commies used to doll it up in different important sounding names like 'proletariat' and 'bourgeois', but it is the just same old beater station wagon, with nothing more than a new paint job. This was almost naked (and why I kept hammering at) calling the daft bimbo a 'true believer in the cause', willing to accept a little 'disruption'. Really? Do they even listen to themselves? She isn't bright enough to understand 'the cause' and has no idea that she might be just a convenient tool for those who do.

The last paragraph made me nervous when I wrote it - I have never said that in writing before but it really needs to be said. Justice Roberts is not going to say it. No court ruling or law professor ever will say it, so we must - I gave my word; to uphold and defend. You might say I am tilting at windmills or that I see a subversive behind every blade of grass, but it is more that we have to parse this stuff so that good people will not be mislead. Understand that these powers really did try to subvert our system on many fronts. They had a real go at our legal system against the Second Amendment back in 2000 or so. It was a very well funded and organized attempt to over throw the Second over the course of a generation. Just as they sought to pack universities with liberalism in order to shape young minds and let them do their dirty work on the ground, they focused on the legal commentary system that courts use to support their opinions and sought to fill it with anti-Second propaganda, all dressed up in important sounding legalese. You may think I am making this up but in 2000 a law school in Chicago devoted an entire special issue of their law review to the effort, for a mere $84,000.00.

https://pjmedia.com/blog/obama-and-the-attempt-to-destroy-the-second-amendment/1/

Unethical? To the extreme. Has that same law school published a response issue? No. I guarantee I could get the same money from the NRA and 100 legal scholars to voluntarily write that response, ...

But it is in chicago, so, ... and guess who was on the Board of the Joyce Foundation that was granting the money for that issue, ...

It is up to you guys, here, every day, to not let this great experiment die, and you guys are magnificent. I only have one paddle to motivate this ship of state but I am doing everything I can from here, struggling to keep up.

AMHO Best all.

[togor]

OK Bodyman, I'll bite.

Below is the Britannica definition of Liberalism

Liberalism, political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual to be the central problem of politics. Liberals typically believe that government is necessary to protect individuals from being harmed by others, but they also recognize that government itself can pose a threat to liberty.

Above you write:

liberalism fails, always

What do you regard as the central problem of politics, if not to protect individual liberty? Please be as concise as the Britannica people, and then we will evaluate if that doctrine too has always failed, or for that matter what that expression even says. I mean, failed in what sense? The founding of the United States, rooted in liberal ideals of individual liberty as a basis for government instead of the edicts of a hereditary monarch, is an ongoing exercise in failure?

[S.A. Boggs]

Harry S Truman and Franklin D. Roosevelt were liberals, Adolph Hitler and Togor are National Socialists...see the difference?
Sam

[S.A. Boggs]

I know I do, ...

You guys are the choir, ... sorry if I bored you but thanks for allowing the attempt. Hopefully you got a few chuckles out it.

Writing helps me think and I enjoy composing such indictments as they flow so easily. At least here we can form a whole sentence without getting screamed at, and it refreshing to be able to finally finish some of them for the first time. If any of it was disagreeable there was much rope with which to hang me, yet it went pretty much uncontested (and sympathetic or not, you guys would have hung me just as quickly). Of course should any of those words help when you are faced with these discussions in person, be my guest.

What caught my attention at the start was that the daft bimbo was a 'true believer in the cause', a 'cause' which certainly appears to be different than the ideals upon which this country was founded and which provided her the prosperity and position she so enjoys.

I don't think we will ever get an answer to what the 'cause' might be, because nobody wants to say it out loud. The green agenda is nothing less than using the environment (instead of 'the workers' this time) as a pretext to rearrange, (this time worldwide) all power and money, and to turn the US and most developed countries into third-world sh!tholes (and they are sh!tholes which is why the people there want to come here). These are not unintended consequences, they are actually THE plan. The 'true believers' appear to fundamentally dislike this country anyway so tearing it apart is no big deal to them - resist, which is really just hate. Nobody wants to destroy the environment, yet that is exactly how anyone who questions them is painted, which is again, more hate, ... but you guys already know all that.

Maybe it is all tilting at windmills, but I'd like to prevent the ruination of our country if possible, and if banging away on a keyboard helps shed the light of day on such insanity and stupidity, or fortifies a few others to do so as well, or if it ultimately helps even one person re-examine what they think, then I am gratified. When you get down to brass tacks, The Second Amendment was the Founding Fathers contemplating the failure of the rest of the Constitution and it is to be looked to ONLY when every other Constitutional mechanism has been completely exhausted, and not before (liberals never can grasp why the NRA is powerful - it is because NRA members are us and we call and vote - ALL of us - The Constitution tells us to, ... and congress-critters know it). No court will ever speak like this so it is up to us out here to do so. So in the end, this is all nothing more than little old me, nobody special, accessing one of those other mechanisms as best I can to help make sure that that Constitution - which I swore to uphold and defend to the best of my ability, ... doesn't fail. To make sure that this little 250 year experiment where we are each Nobility, ... doesn't end.

(and I guarantee that last part got me a special note in my file in the cubicle outside DC somewhere, ...)

AMHO Best all.

Sound familiar?
Sam53516248_1994088247386386_5569102359772004352_n.jpg

[Roadkingtrax]

Sam, are you the enemy?

[togor]

Sam, are you the enemy?

No fair asking him hard questions like that.

[S.A. Boggs]

Nazism is the anti-American "thing" that is proposed. I took the oath 40 years ago and was never released from it. Nazi's swear an oath to party, American's to the Constitution as most of us have. The odd part is that the Nazi's have been know to turn on each other to save
their" hide. The rest of us took care of our buddies and was done the same in return.
Sam

[Roadkingtrax]

No fair asking him hard questions like that.

We can ask him what his son's body count for America was again? Weird.