Bump stock ban begins today

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Allen
    Moderator
    • Sep 2009
    • 10583

    #1

    Bump stock ban begins today

    The ban begins today 3/26. While this has been discussed previously here and most all of us are in agreeance on "don't own one, don't want one, don't see the need in one" the fact remains that they were deemed legal by the BATF, people bought them in good faith, no compensation is being offered and not even an apology from the feds on screwing up. Some sellers on GB and other sites were trying to sell these up till very recently. I suppose they are left holding the bag as well in regard to no compensation.

    Now if something like this can happen while a president like Trump is in office think how much worse things could be with a democrat. Is communism here already? Makes you wonder what else can be deemed illegal and stolen by the government.
  • Major Tom
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 6181

    #2
    I understand that present owners must turn them in with no compensation. I guess if a person decides to keep one, then they would have to be careful where they shoot it so that no one turns them in.

    Comment

    • togor
      Banned
      • Nov 2009
      • 17610

      #3
      I blame Sheldon Adelson.

      The Vegas hotel/casino owner and Trump donor/confidant made it clear to The Donald that these kinds of attacks could be a big exposure problem for those in the venue business. As Trump himself has been in that business, he didn't need to be told twice. Get enough of the wrong kinds of shootings to hurt businesses, and you'll see bans quick.

      Comment

      • RED
        Very Senior Member - OFC
        • Aug 2009
        • 11689

        #4
        Originally posted by togor
        I blame Sheldon Adelson.

        The Vegas hotel/casino owner and Trump donor/confidant made it clear to The Donald that these kinds of attacks could be a big exposure problem for those in the venue business. As Trump himself has been in that business, he didn't need to be told twice. Get enough of the wrong kinds of shootings to hurt businesses, and you'll see bans quick.
        Another absolutely made up deliberate lie and more agitation by the Nazi in chief lying jackass. Show us proof... Sworn testimony before Congress or in any court in the U.S. will be just fine. Put up or shut up. I hope you catch AIDS from your dog.

        Comment

        • Roadkingtrax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2010
          • 7835

          #5
          Originally posted by RED
          Another absolutely made up deliberate lie and more agitation by the Nazi in chief lying jackass. Show us proof... Sworn testimony before Congress or in any court in the U.S. will be just fine. Put up or shut up. I hope you catch AIDS from your dog.
          Trump reduced gun rights, and is obstructing the 2nd Amendment. A SAD DAY!
          Last edited by Roadkingtrax; 03-26-2019, 02:57.
          "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

          Comment

          • togor
            Banned
            • Nov 2009
            • 17610

            #6
            Typical Red misdirection. "Show us...testimony before Congress". LOL, that's not how Trump works! Private calls get it done.

            Comment

            • Allen
              Moderator
              • Sep 2009
              • 10583

              #7
              Possession of bump stocks can get you 10 years in prison starting today.

              This is for buying a LEGAL stock and just a stock. I believe a lot of murderers are freed after about 7 years but owning a piece of plastic that our government said was OK to buy will make you a real felon.

              The largest supplier of bump stocks turned in its entire remaining inventory to be destroyed — some 60,000 devices. Washington state's buyback program was so popular it ran out of money. One dealer ...
              Last edited by Allen; 03-29-2019, 08:18.

              Comment

              • JB White
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2009
                • 13371

                #8
                That was my only opposition to the way the law was written. No just compensation and no provisions for grandfathered ownership even with registration and tax stamp.

                Not enough owners to get a lawsuit moving within the system. The genie is out and setting a precedence. Not until Americans someday discover they are instant felons for owning an operable old fossil fueled car or perhaps too many kitchen knives will people see what is wrong.
                2016 Chicago Cubs. MLB Champions!


                **Never quite as old as the other old farts**

                Comment

                • Allen
                  Moderator
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 10583

                  #9
                  A friend of mine bought a street sweeper shotgun when they first came out. Initially anyone could buy one. Later the BATF claimed that because the bore had no choke it was the same as having a "scatter gun" or a shotgun with the barrel sawed off. They forced everyone to register them or become instant felons and my friend said that is exactly how he felt upon the correspondence he had with them. This is a case where those bought in good faith should have been grandfathered but wasn't. At least the owners could keep and/or sell them.

                  Comment

                  • JohnPeeff
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2010
                    • 252

                    #10
                    My M1A became a "assault weapon" in California because it had a bayonet lug.

                    Comment

                    • Vern Humphrey
                      Administrator - OFC
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 15875

                      #11
                      Originally posted by John Peeff
                      My M1A became a "assault weapon" in California because it had a bayonet lug.
                      And when was the last time someone was bayonetted in California?

                      Comment

                      • free1954
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2010
                        • 1165

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                        And when was the last time someone was bayonetted in California?


                        during the manson murders in 69. it wasn't attached to a rifle at the time.

                        Comment

                        • Vern Humphrey
                          Administrator - OFC
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 15875

                          #13
                          Originally posted by free1954
                          during the manson murders in 69. it wasn't attached to a rifle at the time.
                          Well, a mere half a century makes it okay to outlaw bayonet fixtures.

                          Comment

                          • bostonbound
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2013
                            • 184

                            #14
                            Originally posted by togor
                            I blame Sheldon Adelson.

                            The Vegas hotel/casino owner and Trump donor/confidant made it clear to The Donald that these kinds of attacks could be a big exposure problem for those in the venue business. As Trump himself has been in that business, he didn't need to be told twice. Get enough of the wrong kinds of shootings to hurt businesses, and you'll see bans quick.
                            Do you have any documentation of this statement? Or is it just made up based on your personal dislike of Trump?

                            You lose credibility when you make statements of fact that cannot be sustained.

                            Comment

                            • Vern Humphrey
                              Administrator - OFC
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 15875

                              #15
                              Originally posted by bostonbound
                              Do you have any documentation of this statement? Or is it just made up based on your personal dislike of Trump?

                              You lose credibility when you make statements of fact that cannot be sustained.
                              For him to lose credibility, he'd first have to HAVE credibility.

                              Comment

                              Working...