Can't face life if it means no Avocados...

[Allen]

Do away with welfare and there will be long lines of people wanting to do the jobs that "nobody wants to do".

[S.A. Boggs]

Do away with welfare and there will be long lines of people wanting to do the jobs that "nobody wants to do".

"BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?"
Sam

[Roadkingtrax]

"BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?"
Sam

You could eat them.

[togor]

Do away with welfare and there will be long lines of people wanting to do the jobs that "nobody wants to do".

At poverty wages. Somehow that part always gets left out.

[Vern Humphrey]

I like avocados with a little mayo but I'd rather do w/o them rather than being flooded with Mexicans. An awful small price to pay if that was all there was to it. Now the news media is showing strawberries also insinuating there will be a shortage of them too. We grow strawberries all over the U.S. and as mentioned above we grove avocados here as well. In South Florida we grow the large green pears, not the small wrinkled nearly black ones.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe we can grow most anything here except coffee, tea and bananas mostly because of the lack of land and farms.

We can grow anything we need, and do without things we can't grow unless we allow floods of illegals into the country.

- - - Updated - - -

"BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?"
Sam

I heard that question asked when the Great Society was just a gleam in Lyndon Johnson's eye. We had to pass it "for the children."

Fifty years later and we have more children living in poverty, being raised in single-parent homes than ever before.

[Allen]

Fifty years later and we have more children living in poverty, being raised in single-parent homes than ever before.

But since they were raised on welfare/socialism they vote democrat.

That's all that absolutely matters !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Vern Humphrey]

But since they were raised on welfare/socialism they vote democrat.

That's all that absolutely matters !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And people say slavery has been abolished!

[bostonbound]

"BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CHILDREN?"
Sam

You could eat them.

Already been suggested almost 300 years ago:

A MODEST PROPOSAL FOR PREVENTING THE CHILDREN OF POOR PEOPLE IN IRELAND FROM BEING A BURDEN TO THEIR PARENTS OR COUNTRY, AND FOR MAKING THEM BENEFICIAL TO THE PUBLIC

http://www.online-literature.com/swift/947/

Alternative suggestion: Bring back the property requirement to vote. You need to have skin in the game before deciding the rules.

Or Heinlein's requirement: Only veterans vote.

[togor]

The property ownership requirement would get gamed to death by shell corporations. Only letting veterans vote would mean that the military would become a political enterprise instead of an instrument of national defense.

[Roadkingtrax]

The property ownership requirement would get gamed to death by shell corporations. Only letting veterans vote would mean that the military would become a political enterprise instead of an instrument of national defense.

What about only avacado eaters?