16 Billion Dollars for Farmers Aide... on top of last years 11 Billion

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sandpebble
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2017
    • 2196

    #1

    16 Billion Dollars for Farmers Aide... on top of last years 11 Billion

    16 Billion Dollars for Farmers Aide... on top of last years 11 Billion dollars

    Starting to make me wish I'd been a farmer and voted Trump ...

    After all... being a very small self employed business owner I must confess my income has dropped heavily these past two years . Had to drop clients as finding help that will come to work every day is problematic . On top of which operating costs {insurance, materials , etc. etc } have risen 15 % ..... so where is my share of the 27 Billion ?

    Hey ... I'm with ya on the anti socialist thing .... but this bail out is different ??
  • togor
    Banned
    • Nov 2009
    • 17610

    #2
    To their credit, most farmers would rather have a normal export market. But we've way overbuilt our ag production in cereals, livestock and dairy. There is going to be a shake out, no matter what.

    Comment

    • pcox
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 386

      #3
      I doubt any of us could feed ourselves in the manner to which we've become accustomed with out the American farmer. I don't mind them getting some help, I hope they all prosper. I'm sure I could produce enough food to survive on my little patch of ground in Missouri, but at seventy-one, I don't want to try it.

      Comment

      • bruce
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 3759

        #4
        Where is your share of the 27 Billion? Do you farm? If so, you may qualify. If you do not farm, you do not qualify. For my part, I consider that the 27 billion is the least that is owed to farmers whose income has been arbitrarily damaged by these tariffs. JMHO. Sincerely. bruce.
        " Unlike most conservatives, libs have no problem exploiting dead children and dancing on their graves."

        Comment

        • Sandpebble
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2017
          • 2196

          #5
          You miss the point Bruce....

          it would appear the 27 Billion isn't about help, it's the purchase of votes .... kinda how you feel about Social Benefits and Dems ....

          Comment

          • togor
            Banned
            • Nov 2009
            • 17610

            #6
            Originally posted by Sandpebble
            You miss the point Bruce....

            it would appear the 27 Billion isn't about help, it's the purchase of votes .... kinda how you feel about Social Benefits and Dems ....
            Well that's part of it for sure, but people want a steady supply of affordable food, and that means getting government involved to take the edges of the gyrations of the free market.

            I remember the old joke: How do you starve a farmer?

            Nail his mailbox shut.
            Last edited by togor; 05-25-2019, 03:19.

            Comment

            • Vern Humphrey
              Administrator - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 15875

              #7
              The man I ran against when I ran for Congress, Marion Berry, was on the House Agriculture Committee. He pushed through an "emergency" bill, and personally profited from it to the tune of $80,000. Now most of his land was in the Conservation Reserve Program -- lying fallow and unplanted. What kind of an "emergency" would affect CRP land?

              The good part is that he broke up his holdings and concealed them under a tortured arrangement, so he couldn't be attacked like that again, He "gave" land away to confederates. And when he left Congress, his old friends refused to give the land back.

              Comment

              • togor
                Banned
                • Nov 2009
                • 17610

                #8
                Thank goodness politicians don't declare bogus emergencies anymore!! The bean farmers need to switch to a different crop if those beans won't be going to feed Chinese hogs anymore. Not a bad thing if the marginal and flood prone fields come out of production. Automation has hollowed out the countryside anyways. 1 or 2 guys can farm 2000 acres (over 3 square miles) of cereals.

                Comment

                • Sako
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 654

                  #9
                  Originally posted by togor
                  Thank goodness politicians don't declare bogus emergencies anymore!! The bean farmers need to switch to a different crop if those beans won't be going to feed Chinese hogs anymore. Not a bad thing if the marginal and flood prone fields come out of production. Automation has hollowed out the countryside anyways. 1 or 2 guys can farm 2000 acres (over 3 square miles) of cereals.
                  Its not as easy as just deciding to switch crops. Beans have been fairly stable on price and return on investment has been attractive if you can beat the weather, insects, weeds and market versatility, oh! and government help.

                  Comment

                  • Sako
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 654

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Sandpebble
                    You miss the point Bruce....

                    it would appear the 27 Billion isn't about help, it's the purchase of votes .... kinda how you feel about Social Benefits and Dems ....
                    This shows how little you know about farming, there are not enough farmers left to change an election if they all voted twice.

                    Comment

                    • pcox
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 386

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Sandpebble
                      You miss the point Bruce....

                      it would appear the 27 Billion isn't about help, it's the purchase of votes .... kinda how you feel about Social Benefits and Dems ....
                      Oh, you don't know me from Adam and you know how I feel about Social Benefits (whatever that is) and Dems. You must be a mind reader.

                      As I said before, try to feed your self for a while, then tell me how you feel about farmers.

                      Comment

                      • S.A. Boggs
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 8568

                        #12
                        Pebbles apparently concerns himself with grain in a liquid form.
                        Sam

                        Comment

                        • Vern Humphrey
                          Administrator - OFC
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 15875

                          #13
                          Originally posted by pcox
                          Oh, you don't know me from Adam and you know how I feel about Social Benefits (whatever that is) and Dems. You must be a mind reader.
                          This is further evidence of narcissm. They imagine what you think and reality has to conform to their imagination.

                          Comment

                          • Allen
                            Moderator
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 10583

                            #14
                            Farms should be preserved at any cost. As our population grows like there's no tomorrow our farms are going to the way side, the U.S. becoming more and more dependent upon foreign countries for food. The importance of farmers should only be behind border security perhaps and these billions of dollars are only a drop in the hat compared to what the U.S. has been losing to China, Japan, S. America and many other countries due to the trade imbalance. It won't be forever and will eventually balance out.

                            The whole thread of course was just started as yet another (daily) Trump bashing.

                            Comment

                            • S.A. Boggs
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 8568

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Allen
                              Farms should be preserved at any cost. As our population grows like there's no tomorrow our farms are going to the way side, the U.S. becoming more and more dependent upon foreign countries for food. The importance of farmers should only be behind border security perhaps and these billions of dollars are only a drop in the hat compared to what the U.S. has been losing to China, Japan, S. America and many other countries due to the trade imbalance. It won't be forever and will eventually balance out.

                              The whole thread of course was just started as yet another (daily) Trump bashing.
                              What else can the Nazi's say since "their" accomplishments are, murdering babies, giving money to Iran to use against America [wonder how many of our troops have been murdered by the money Barry gave to them?], people who are confused as to what sex they are, perverts in women's bathrooms...the list is endless.
                              Sam

                              Comment

                              Working...