Aid In The Desert

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Allen
    Moderator
    • Sep 2009
    • 10583

    #16
    Originally posted by S.A. Boggs
    Why is it "our" socialists want the illegals here but won't pay for them while here? Peebles states he needs people to work for him, yet I have not heard that HE is willing to take full responsibility for them while here. What's up with that? Togey like to run his mouth, same as RKT how many ARE THEY willing to sponsor? These 3 are all hat and no show!
    Sam
    Even if people were willing to take care of them they would still be on our soil and reproducing.

    A MUCH better scenario I think is for these bleeding heart liberals to go to THEIR countries and take care of them. Of course they would have to stay there because the slackers are never going to be self-supporting.
    Last edited by Allen; 05-29-2019, 05:20.

    Comment

    • Roadkingtrax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 7835

      #17
      Are they taking jobs or a drain on domestic welfare? Allen and Boggs have to sort out their arguments a bit.
      "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

      Comment

      • clintonhater
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2015
        • 5220

        #18
        Originally posted by Roadkingtrax
        Are they taking jobs or a drain on domestic welfare? Allen and Boggs have to sort out their arguments a bit.
        When they only came to WORK, sending their wages back home to their families (which, incidentally, is still how about half the population of the Philippines support themselves), they were not taking jobs nor sponging on welfare. It's when they came to STAY, either bringing their large families with them, or starting new ones with some accommodating native whore, or both, that they became parasites.

        Comment

        • Allen
          Moderator
          • Sep 2009
          • 10583

          #19
          Originally posted by clintonhater
          When they only came to WORK, sending their wages back home to their families (which, incidentally, is still how about half the population of the Philippines support themselves), they were not taking jobs nor sponging on welfare. It's when they came to STAY, either bringing their large families with them, or starting new ones with some accommodating native whore, or both, that they became parasites.
          True and the money they send back "home" is not only for support but to finance their trip to the U.S. to stay and set up housekeeping.

          Comment

          • S.A. Boggs
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 8568

            #20
            I have no problem with people coming to the U.S. legally to work, I do having them sponge. As to sending $, place a user fee of say 5% on ANY money transmitted overseas and the money to be placed in our treasury for border security only.
            Sam

            Comment

            • lyman
              Administrator - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 11269

              #21
              5% on any money transmitted overseas??

              Comment

              • Roadkingtrax
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2010
                • 7835

                #22
                Originally posted by lyman
                5% on any money transmitted overseas??
                Dont think the offshore folks are going to go for that.
                "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                Comment

                • lyman
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 11269

                  #23
                  Originally posted by Roadkingtrax
                  Dont think the offshore folks are going to go for that.
                  nor any business that purchases or sell goods from overseas,,,

                  Comment

                  • Roadkingtrax
                    Senior Member
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 7835

                    #24
                    Originally posted by lyman
                    nor any business that purchases or sell goods from overseas,,,
                    Like many of us do on a daily basis. Sam would like a tariff of 5% on all finanical transactions. I think most would favor less taxation, as a strict fiscally conservative principle.
                    "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                    Comment

                    • clintonhater
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2015
                      • 5220

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Allen
                      True and the money they send back "home" is not only for support but to finance their trip to the U.S. to stay and set up housekeeping.
                      They can live much better in their home countries on the income from a US job than they could live here on the same money. But then, at home, they wouldn't have the US benefits of free schooling, health care, etc., so that's why most have given up the old system, esp. since they know that in sanctuary states they now have little to fear from US authorities.

                      Comment

                      • togor
                        Banned
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 17610

                        #26
                        5% would bite a few ex-pats also who are Americans but earn their living overseas. Hey can we call it a tax? Some taxes are suddenly popular among some on the right now.

                        Comment

                        • S.A. Boggs
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 8568

                          #27
                          Originally posted by lyman
                          5% on any money transmitted overseas??
                          I am talking about private money, not corporation. "User fee" would help finance guarding our border from those who want to come here illegal or smuggler's.
                          Sam

                          Comment

                          • lyman
                            Administrator - OFC
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 11269

                            #28
                            Originally posted by S.A. Boggs
                            I am talking about private money, not corporation. "User fee" would help finance guarding our border from those who want to come here illegal or smuggler's.
                            Sam
                            western union, due to Frank Dodd Act IIRC already has a pile of regulations on sending money to mexico (vs sending it anywhere esle)

                            W\U makes a ton of money sending money to mexico

                            Comment

                            • S.A. Boggs
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 8568

                              #29
                              Since I don't/never have sent $ out of country, I am not familiar with the regulations. Locally Wal-Mart does a great deal of them with the foreign students buying them. Why would/could be the issue of utilizing a foreign transaction fee of 5% of the total remitted for border security?
                              Sam

                              Comment

                              • lyman
                                Administrator - OFC
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 11269

                                #30
                                Originally posted by S.A. Boggs
                                Since I don't/never have sent $ out of country, I am not familiar with the regulations. Locally Wal-Mart does a great deal of them with the foreign students buying them. Why would/could be the issue of utilizing a foreign transaction fee of 5% of the total remitted for border security?
                                Sam
                                it would be a federal tax, meaning it would need federal approval, unless enacted state wide in all the states,
                                granted a tax on one specific thing, but a tax it is,

                                Comment

                                Working...