No prosecution for Comey?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RED
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 11689

    #1

    No prosecution for Comey?

    So the MSM is cheering because their favorite hero is going to walk free, write a book, and become a multi, multi, millionaire.

    Maybe it is just not worth the effort, the real crime here is the attempted overthrow of the U.S. Government. That is treason and Comey, McCabe, et al are all eligible to have a date with Old Sparky.
  • lyman
    Administrator - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 11269

    #2
    you act surprised,

    you know nothing was going to happen,

    surely he had dirt on both R's and D's or his trial would bring up too much on both sides for anyone in DC to risk

    Comment

    • dogtag
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 14985

      #3
      I'm beginning to have doubts about the AG.
      Truth is, virtually no one in politics is trustworthy.
      It's all one big happy family who've adopted the
      Musketeers' slogan "All for one, and one for all"

      Comment

      • Vern Humphrey
        Administrator - OFC
        • Aug 2009
        • 15875

        #4
        It's "All for me, and some for whoever can help me gain more power."

        Comment

        • Allen
          Moderator
          • Sep 2009
          • 10583

          #5
          Originally posted by dogtag
          I'm beginning to have doubts about the AG.
          It's starting to look like Sessions taught Barr everything he knew about not doing anything.

          Comment

          • Clark Howard
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 2105

            #6
            No need for the long faces, guys. The big trouble for Comey and the other perps is coming with the later investigations.

            Comment

            • m1ashooter
              Senior Member
              • May 2011
              • 3220

              #7
              But did he break a law or just a policy?
              To Error Is Human To Forgive Is Not SAC Policy

              Comment

              • Vern Humphrey
                Administrator - OFC
                • Aug 2009
                • 15875

                #8
                Originally posted by m1ashooter
                But did he break a law or just a policy?
                Abuse of power and obstruction of justice are two that come to mind.

                Comment

                • Sandpebble
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2017
                  • 2196

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                  Abuse of power and obstruction of justice are two that come to mind.
                  Well now..... that's a very interesting comment .

                  Comment

                  • sid
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 3198

                    #10
                    Barr announced several weeks ago that he was not going to indict Comey. I was surprised because Rush Limbaugh said that Barr was an honest and really tough guy.

                    So another one of Limbaugh's predictions goes down the drain.

                    Comment

                    • Allen
                      Moderator
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 10583

                      #11
                      Originally posted by sid
                      Barr announced several weeks ago that he was not going to indict Comey.
                      To say that after the results of a the investigation is one thing. To say it weeks in advance before knowing the outcome of the hearing is quite another. Obviously he planned on doing nothing and there was no need in the investigation in the first place.

                      May be time for another AG. One that will work.

                      Comment

                      • RED
                        Very Senior Member - OFC
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 11689

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Allen
                        To say that after the results of a the investigation is one thing. To say it weeks in advance before knowing the outcome of the hearing is quite another. Obviously he planned on doing nothing and there was no need in the investigation in the first place.

                        May be time for another AG. One that will work.
                        You guys don't jump to conclusions, you pole vault.

                        "To say it weeks in advance before knowing the outcome..." Of course he knew the outcome. He was privy to all the investigations and knew beforehand that the rule violations wee not what they wanted to use to indict. It is the same reason you haven't seen Trump's taxes. Obama, Hillary, Holder, lynch, Lerner, Mueller, Comey, McCabe, and dozens of other Democrats have known what was in Trump's taxes for years. If there was anything they could have used, it is insane to suggest they wouldn't have used it.

                        Comey and several others that betrayed our country and disgraced our institutions will at some point get to make a perp walk... Hopefully before November 2020.

                        BTW, as you read this their are 1/2 dozen Grand Juries at work.
                        Last edited by RED; 09-01-2019, 08:24.

                        Comment

                        • togor
                          Banned
                          • Nov 2009
                          • 17610

                          #13
                          Who is pole vaulting to conclusions now? Explain how Obama saw Trump's taxes without leaving any trace. Did he teleport in and out of the document room after hours?
                          Last edited by togor; 09-01-2019, 10:45.

                          Comment

                          • RED
                            Very Senior Member - OFC
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 11689

                            #14
                            Originally posted by togor
                            Who is pole vaulting to conclusions now? Explain how Obama saw Trump's taxes without leaving any trace. Did he teleport in and out of the document room after hours?
                            Are you xxxxtin me? You sre dumber than a rock. He called Lois on his secure cell phone and asked her "what the fook is in Trumps taxes?" So you think her reply was "Oh, Mr. President, I can't tell you that. Why that would not be ethical."

                            Lie, lie, lie, agitate, agitate, , low life piece of traitorous scum.
                            Last edited by RED; 09-01-2019, 07:54.

                            Comment

                            • togor
                              Banned
                              • Nov 2009
                              • 17610

                              #15
                              Originally posted by RED
                              Are you xxxxtin me? You sre dumber than a rock. He called Lois on his secure cell phone and asked her "what the fook is in Trumps taxes?" So you think her reply was "Oh, Mr. President, I can't tell you that. Why that would not be ethical."

                              Lie, lie, lie, agitate, agitate, , low life piece of traitorous scum.
                              My understanding is that tax record access is logged, that if Obama had access, there would be a trail. You have only self serving speculation.

                              So let's flip it. Is Trump spying on his enemies via his access to their tax records? He has a lot of enemies. I think in Obama's case he knew better, and in Trump's case the lawyers tell him it could bite him bad.

                              I like it better when you think stuff through.
                              Last edited by togor; 09-02-2019, 04:54.

                              Comment

                              Working...