Not only yes but Hell yes. Officers dispatched to a report of a open door and when they see somebody inside... gun season for innocent citizens is open. A cop stops a car for a for a vehicle infraction and asks the driver for his DL, the guy reaches for his pocket and is shot dead... no gun involved. And then there is this: a shoplifter that stole a belt and a shirt, runs from police, breaks into a strangers house and hides in a bathroom. SWAT is called and they literally destroy a $500,000 home and the home owner is the one who is responsible. His home and his life are destroyed but it is OK, SWAT didn't do anything wrong it is all the homeowners fault.
So the shop lifter fired a shot... how is that the home owners fault? The cops could have just waited 24 hours (or a week) and the guy would have given up. No way!!! My God, why would the cops do something for the innocent owner when they can fook him up for life with no consequence.
Upheld by the Federal Court, the precedent set here is that if your 16 year old kid runs from the cops and hides in his bedroom, it is ok for the cops to bulldoze your house, arguably with you, your wife, and two other kids inside.
So the shop lifter fired a shot... how is that the home owners fault? The cops could have just waited 24 hours (or a week) and the guy would have given up. No way!!! My God, why would the cops do something for the innocent owner when they can fook him up for life with no consequence.
Upheld by the Federal Court, the precedent set here is that if your 16 year old kid runs from the cops and hides in his bedroom, it is ok for the cops to bulldoze your house, arguably with you, your wife, and two other kids inside.

Comment