An interesting thought...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • togor
    Banned
    • Nov 2009
    • 17610

    #31
    Originally posted by Art
    Togor, sometimes you are a total tool.
    Explain.

    You know as well as I do the process two-step that is about to unfold, and that there is literally no process that the House would have followed that would give both a real investigation and garner GOP support. If I am wrong on that point you can enlighten me now.
    Last edited by togor; 01-16-2020, 05:00. Reason: Typos

    Comment

    • RED
      Very Senior Member - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 11689

      #32
      Originally posted by Art
      Togor, sometimes you are a total tool.
      Tooi or fool? Either one works.

      Comment

      • togor
        Banned
        • Nov 2009
        • 17610

        #33
        Originally posted by RED
        Double speak from a traitor Communist agitator. Twist and turn, hate and burn.
        Ad hominem attacks. Seems like old times!

        Comment

        • Art
          Senior Member, Deceased
          • Dec 2009
          • 9256

          #34
          Originally posted by RED
          Tooi or fool? Either one works.
          You certainly aren't a fool.

          Donald Trump is being impeached purely on matters of process, not being cooperative enough with congress.. Holder was held in contempt over similar matters of process. The comparisons are on point. That is the sum total of it.
          Last edited by Art; 01-16-2020, 05:08.

          Comment

          • togor
            Banned
            • Nov 2009
            • 17610

            #35
            Originally posted by Art
            You certainly aren't a fool.

            Donald Trump is being impeached purely on matters of process, not being cooperative enough with congress.. Holder was held in contempt over similar matters of process. The comparisons are on point. That is the sum total of it.
            Trump is being impeached for trying to squeeze a foreign government to provide dirt on a domestic political rival, by misusing a Congressional appropriation for private political purposes. That's the charge. If you cannot see on your own how they came to it (whether you agree or not), then nothing I say can help. Maybe you can get the cell number of Lev Parnas.

            Comment

            • lyman
              Administrator - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 11269

              #36
              Originally posted by RED
              Tooi or fool? Either one works.
              you have been good for soooo long,


              don't break that record now,




              note to all,

              lets not let this escalate,

              Comment

              • S.A. Boggs
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2009
                • 8568

                #37
                I do not see the impeachment as a benefit for the Democrats, just a millstone around their neck. Bernie is coming on strong and that worries a great many in their party. Our economy is great and now with the passing of the trade acts it can only improve. People will vote their wallet, one just has to see the outpour of support @ the President's rallies. Locally the only ones who still believe in the Democratic Party are Socialists or "Hillary really won" people. President Trump could find a cure for cancer and the Democrats would ask what will he charge for this.
                Democracy in America is dying and the Republic is on a role. The Democrats have no substance and the only platform is to give away freebies and raise taxes.
                Sam

                Comment

                • Art
                  Senior Member, Deceased
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 9256

                  #38
                  Originally posted by togor
                  Trump is being impeached for trying to squeeze a foreign government to provide dirt on a domestic political rival, by misusing a Congressional appropriation for private political purposes. That's the charge. If you cannot see on your own how they came to it (whether you agree or not), then nothing I say can help. Maybe you can get the cell number of Lev Parnas.
                  Trump is being impeached for having the political style of Don Rickles; because he's rude, crude and obnoxious. He's also being impeached because he truly is an outsider who won against an insider and isn't playing the game. Additionally he's being impeached because he is looking more and more like he will win the next election. Trump hadn't even been sworn in before Democrats started looking for a way to impeach him in fact orders of impeachment were submitted practically before the inaugural ball venues had been cleaned up. Al Green, D. Tex. put it all in a nutshell when asked why it was so important to impeach Trump. Green said "because he could get re elected.

                  Parnas (this year's Michael Avenatti) is under indictment for campaign finance abuses. That alone doesn't impeach him as a witness but the fact that he is a proven liar does. Parnas made the provable lie that Devin Nunez met with a Ukrainian prosecutor in Prague when Nunez was able to show conclusively that he had never been in the Czech Republic. Nunez is suing the organizations who carried that lie, particularly The Daily Beast for liable. I figure, even with the latitude the press has regarding public people, he'll probably win.

                  I will guarantee that if this impeachment fails, which it almost surely will, and the Democrats retain the House of Representatives he will be impeached and again without any Republican votes and some defections from the Democrat side.

                  Bill Clinton was really impeached because his enemies decided he was unfit for office; it is also why Donald Trump is being impeached. Being unfit for office isn't an impeachable offense. Decisions on fitness for office are supposed to be decided in elections.
                  Last edited by Art; 01-17-2020, 04:35.

                  Comment

                  • Gun Smoke
                    Banned
                    • Sep 2019
                    • 1658

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Art
                    Bill Clinton was really impeached because his enemies decided he was unfit for office; it is also why Donald Trump is being impeached. Being unfit for office isn't an impeachable offense. Decisions on fitness for office are supposed to be decided in elections.
                    Bill clinton was impeached due to an impeachable crime.

                    The Ukraine got their (our) money and within the due date. Trump merely asked them to investigate corruption within their country caused by an American, a law signed by bill clinton during the clinton infestation. Other things may come about the next few days but I feel the democrats have presented everything they have, which is nothing.

                    Trump asking the Ukrainian president to investigate American corruption in their country is as unlawful as a mail carrier putting mail in your mail box.

                    Comment

                    • Art
                      Senior Member, Deceased
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 9256

                      #40
                      Gun Smoke

                      That Bill Clinton's crime was an impeachable offense is highly debatable. I don't think it was but that's just my opinion.
                      Last edited by Art; 01-17-2020, 05:10.

                      Comment

                      • togor
                        Banned
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 17610

                        #41
                        Gun Smoke wildly distorts the facts of what transpired in Ukraine, and has no explanation at all for whatever the h*ll Giuliani and his cronies were doing over there on Trump's behalf. But no one else here who supports Trump is even willing to come that close to engaging with the facts, so I suppose GS gets a tiny bit of credit.

                        Comment

                        • Vern Humphrey
                          Administrator - OFC
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 15875

                          #42
                          Originally posted by Art
                          Gun Smoke

                          That Bill Clinton's crime was an impeachable offense is highly debatable. I don't think it was but that's just my opinion.
                          US Constitution, Article 2, Section 4:

                          The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

                          Perjury is a serious crime.
                          Last edited by Vern Humphrey; 01-17-2020, 06:12.

                          Comment

                          • Art
                            Senior Member, Deceased
                            • Dec 2009
                            • 9256

                            #43
                            Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                            US Constitution, Article 2, Section 4:

                            The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

                            Perjury is a serious crime.
                            It is, but the Constitution does not specify just any serious crime it specifies a crime that rises to the level of treason as defined in the constitution or, in my opinion, systemic bribery as in the Hastings case. What Clinton lied about had nothing to do with his conduct as president except trying to avoid personal and political embarrassment. The Articles of Impeachment against Trump don't even allege a crime.

                            We are on a slippery slope of trying to remove presidents we don't like without an election. In the first 180 years since the adoption of the Constitution we had one impeachment. In the last 44 years we've had three (I'm counting Nixon) and every president since Ford has had a formal bill of impeachment filed against him, though it didn't get anywhere against the Bushs and Obama.
                            Last edited by Art; 01-17-2020, 07:14.

                            Comment

                            • Vern Humphrey
                              Administrator - OFC
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 15875

                              #44
                              Originally posted by Art
                              It is, but the Constitution does not specify just any serious crime it specifies a crime that rises to the level of treason as defined in the constitution or, in my opinion, systemic bribery as in the Hastings case. What Clinton lied about had nothing to do with his conduct as president except trying to avoid personal and political embarrassment. The Articles of Impeachment against Trump don't even allege a crime.

                              We are on a slippery slope of trying to remove presidents we don't like without an election. In the first 180 years since the adoption of the Constitution we had one impeachment. In the last 44 years we've had three (I'm counting Nixon) and every president since Ford has had a formal bill of impeachment filed against him, though it didn't get anywhere against the Bushs and Obama.
                              Re-read it. Note the word "Misdemeanor." A misdemeanor is an offense not serious enough to be considered a crime, like jaywalking or spitting on the street.

                              We probably need a constitutional amendment to define what is an impeachable offense. This would make a good model

                              Article III, Section. 3.
                              Clause 1: Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

                              As you can see, the definition of treason is closely circumscribed and the standard of proof is spelled out.

                              Comment

                              • Art
                                Senior Member, Deceased
                                • Dec 2009
                                • 9256

                                #45
                                Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                                We probably need a constitutional amendment to define what is an impeachable offense. .
                                I think you may very well be right. We've now had formal impeachment hearings against 3 of the last 7 Presidents, two of whom were impeached and one who resigned. I don't think this is tenable going forward.
                                Last edited by Art; 01-17-2020, 08:54.

                                Comment

                                Working...