Only one thing could hurt Trump's re-election ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dogtag
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 14985

    #1

    Only one thing could hurt Trump's re-election ...

    If something happens to the economy, and you'd better
    believe the democrat media will keep on trying to make
    it tank or to make it look as though it's going to tank.
    The soaring debt is their best bet so they'll probably
    concentrate on that. At least, that's my bet.
    If Michelle jumps in, which I'm still thinking she will,
    she could bring Trump's winning numbers down but not
    enough to deny him a second term.
    Bernie who I thought early on would be the nominee
    will have to overcome the bombardment coming from
    the democrats who hate him with a passion because they
    know that an out and out communist doesn't stand a
    snowball's chance in you know where.
    Like Clinton said "It's the economy stupid"
  • Roadkingtrax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 7835

    #2
    ...also if he touches Grandma's Social Security. Oops.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/23/u...-security.html

    He'll protect that like he does the 2nd Amendment, Deployed US Troops, and his daughter Tiffany.
    "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

    Comment

    • JohnMOhio
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 1545

      #3
      I tend to agree with you on this one dogtag. I am just surprised at how many people out there just don't understand what socialism is all about. How can they really support Bernie at all. Is it possible all his supporters are already on the gravy train?
      Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.
      Author unkown.

      Comment

      • Gun Smoke
        Banned
        • Sep 2019
        • 1658

        #4
        Originally posted by JohnMOhio
        I tend to agree with you on this one dogtag. I am just surprised at how many people out there just don't understand what socialism is all about. How can they really support Bernie at all. Is it possible all his supporters are already on the gravy train?
        It's not just Bernie, it's all of them, though Bernie may be the worse.

        Comment

        • togor
          Banned
          • Nov 2009
          • 17610

          #5
          Funny thing about socialism....how it sneaks up on people.

          If Bernie went to Knoxville and called for socialized electricity production, what would they say? What could they say? The state of Tennessee and bits of border states has socialized electricity, and people are fine with it.

          Comment

          • dryheat
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 10587

            #6
            Socialized electricity? I guess. I know what he means but 1930's "socialism" was just progression from the dark ages for a lot of the country. Now it means free cell phones, which I guess is kind of a form of electricity for people who are still in the dark ages communication wise(I'm a little surprised how this comparison went). OK, maybe free cell phones, but not free sex changes.
            If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

            Comment

            • Gun Smoke
              Banned
              • Sep 2019
              • 1658

              #7
              Originally posted by dryheat
              Socialized electricity?
              Yep, that's where everyone gets "free" electricity except for those who work, which pay for everyone else.

              The democrats today want: Socialized ___________________

              Fill in the blank with anything you desire.

              Comment

              • togor
                Banned
                • Nov 2009
                • 17610

                #8
                TVA

                Added: socialized and subsidized are not exactly the same thing, although given politics they run together often.

                Health care for seniors is both. Wall Street privatizes profit and socializes loss whenever they can.

                There's plenty to criticize about socialism, but also things that are popular even among Republicans. Unfortunately few seem capable of an honest discussion and opposing socialism has devolved to opposing government involvement in that stuff that those people care about but we don't.
                Last edited by togor; 01-25-2020, 06:02.

                Comment

                • Vern Humphrey
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 15875

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Gun Smoke
                  It's not just Bernie, it's all of them, though Bernie may be the worse.
                  Remember what George Orwell said, "Socialists don't love the poor, they hate the rich." Hatred is a powerful motivator.

                  Comment

                  • dryheat
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 10587

                    #10
                    Hatred is a powerful motivator.-
                    I'm darned sure it is. "I love hate", I heard that somewhere but I don't know where. But I like it. Kind of like Archie's greatest line; "Gawd, I hate fun". Hate has various levels. From the short term; I hate this job to real crazy. Festering impotence fosters hate. Better to stand up and say, that's enough and relieve the pressure. Unless your wrong in the first place then sit still.
                    If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

                    Comment

                    • Johnny P
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 6269

                      #11
                      Originally posted by togor
                      Funny thing about socialism....how it sneaks up on people.

                      If Bernie went to Knoxville and called for socialized electricity production, what would they say? What could they say? The state of Tennessee and bits of border states has socialized electricity, and people are fine with it.
                      Is it your thought that people on TVA get free electricity? Residential customers on TVA pay about 9 cents a kwh, and on my public utility I am paying about 10 cents per kwh. I will attribute the 1 cent to the difference in cost of hydro vs. nuclear generation.

                      Best read up on why TVA was actually developed.

                      Comment

                      • togor
                        Banned
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 17610

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Johnny P
                        Is it your thought that people on TVA get free electricity? Residential customers on TVA pay about 9 cents a kwh, and on my public utility I am paying about 10 cents per kwh. I will attribute the 1 cent to the difference in cost of hydro vs. nuclear generation.

                        Best read up on why TVA was actually developed.
                        No! Again, socialized and subsidized are two different things. But the government went into the Tennessee River Valley in part because capitalism had not or could not. So the initial investment in flood control and economic development was subsidized by taxpayers of the forty eight states. If today the TVA is self-supporting (non entirely clear if that will be true when eventual nuke plant decommissioning costs are added up) it remains true that the TVA is a government-owned corporation, and not unpopular. Socialized electricity for Tennessee meeting with popular approval.

                        BTW I used to do a few projects for the Chattanooga office. Got the hard hat tour of the Raccoon Mountain pumped hydro plant. Had time to kill once so a cabbie took me on a tour where Reggie White grew up.
                        Last edited by togor; 01-26-2020, 09:03. Reason: 48 states then not 50

                        Comment

                        • Gun Smoke
                          Banned
                          • Sep 2019
                          • 1658

                          #13
                          Originally posted by togor
                          No! Again, socialized and subsidized are two different things.
                          They're also the same. Government hand-outs at taxpayers expense.

                          Comment

                          • Vern Humphrey
                            Administrator - OFC
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 15875

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Gun Smoke
                            They're also the same. Government hand-outs at taxpayers expense.
                            Exactly right -- what you give to a man what he has not earned, you must take from another what he has earned.

                            Comment

                            • togor
                              Banned
                              • Nov 2009
                              • 17610

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Gun Smoke
                              They're also the same. Government hand-outs at taxpayers expense.
                              The government subsidized agriculture, but doesn't take ownership of the farms. Private sector companies will subsidize money losing divisions with profits from other operations in pursuit of a strategic goal. The US road system is largely socialized and subsidized by taxpayer revenue, with toll roads like I90 east of Chicago being government owned through the toll road authority but supported by user fees as opposed to general revenue. And of course there is the military.

                              Comment

                              Working...