Greyhound will STOP Border Patrol agents from checking buses for illegals

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rayg
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 7444

    #1

    Greyhound will STOP Border Patrol agents from checking buses for illegals

    Greyhound says it will STOP Border Patrol agents from boarding buses to make immigration checks on passengers.

    I bet half of their income is from illegal passengers...So you can understand why they don't want checks...Sanctuary buses..Lol

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cks-buses.html
    Last edited by rayg; 02-22-2020, 04:58.
  • S.A. Boggs
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 8579

    #2
    Interfering with a law enforcement officer in the performance of their duties comes to mind.
    Sam

    Comment

    • togor
      Banned
      • Nov 2009
      • 17610

      #3
      So warrants are a thing of the past now for the base? Imagine if the cops siezed Giuliani's files without a warrant? The howls! Greyhound says... we're a private company running a legal business. If you're going to interfere with that business, then show probable cause to a judge, and get a damn warrant.

      How is that not a 100% Conservative position?

      Comment

      • rayg
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 7444

        #4
        Of course you side with illegals, why would I expect different from a liberal. I should have known...Lol
        Last edited by rayg; 02-22-2020, 07:04.

        Comment

        • lyman
          Administrator - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 11296

          #5
          seems it would be easier to just have a car/van/whatever at the stop, or where they pick up the folks,,,

          if the bus is not crossing a border,, then why bother?

          Comment

          • togor
            Banned
            • Nov 2009
            • 17610

            #6
            Originally posted by rayg
            Of course you side with illegals, why would I expect different from a liberal. I should have known...Lol
            Read again.

            Siding with:

            1. Private companies being free from government intrusion while operating within the law.

            2. Government agencies being forced to follow the rules.

            Yeah I know: you want you want, and damn anybody who has a problem with that. That's not conservative either.
            Last edited by togor; 02-22-2020, 09:23.

            Comment

            • Vern Humphrey
              Administrator - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 15875

              #7
              Originally posted by lyman
              seems it would be easier to just have a car/van/whatever at the stop, or where they pick up the folks,,,

              if the bus is not crossing a border,, then why bother?
              The Border Patrol isn't required to have a warrant in order to stop and search a vehicle -- nor is the Coast Guard required to have a warrant to stop and search a ship. It's been that way since those organizations were formed.

              Comment

              • togor
                Banned
                • Nov 2009
                • 17610

                #8
                A link from people who made it their business to know the rules:

                The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects people from random and arbitrary stops and searches. Although the federal government claims the power to conduct certain kinds of warrantless stops within 100 miles of the U.S. border, important Fourth Amendment protections still apply.

                Comment

                • dryheat
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 10587

                  #9
                  That's what got sheriff Joe in trouble. But if it quacks like duck and walks like a duck and says, No Ingles it might be a duck.
                  Last edited by dryheat; 02-22-2020, 09:30.
                  If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

                  Comment

                  • S.A. Boggs
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 8579

                    #10
                    Originally posted by togor
                    Read again.

                    Siding with:

                    1. Private companies being free from government intrusion while operating within the law.

                    2. Government agencies being forced to follow the rules.

                    Yeah I know: you want you want, and damn anybody who has a problem with that. That's not conservative either.
                    How about simply stopping the bus on any highway and do a K9 walkaround. Drugs are trafficked this way and ARE ILLEGAL UNDER FEDERAL LAW regardless of what any state says.
                    Sam

                    Comment

                    • rayg
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 7444

                      #11
                      A search of a vehicle and persons within the vehicle can be legally made with out a warrant if there is "probable cause" that a crime is being committed. This is because a vehicle is mobile and a bus is not a home unless used as one. Of course probable cause needs some information or probably cause. more then just a guess that there is an illegal on board . However It's possible that once it's established via past incidents, or arrests of illegals, that a number of buses in certain locations have been are found to contain illegals. That may be strong enough to have set precedent to allow certain buss's to be searched with out a warrant at will...
                      Personally I don't think the bus companies would like if the police started to detain their buss's until a warrant is obtained. Which may take hours and the bus company would have a lot of unhappy customers,.
                      Last edited by rayg; 02-22-2020, 11:27.

                      Comment

                      • dogtag
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 14985

                        #12
                        As I recall, Border Agents have guns. Do Greyhound drivers have guns ?

                        Comment

                        • S.A. Boggs
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 8579

                          #13
                          One of my clients called "unfair" when the S.O with a warrant was searching for what was named and found something else. My client argued since the contraband was not named in the warrant it could not be seized and he arrested.
                          Sam

                          Comment

                          • rayg
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 7444

                            #14
                            Ha, Ha, incident to a legal search warrant and any thing not legal that is also in clear view during the search can be also seized..
                            Last edited by rayg; 02-22-2020, 11:05.

                            Comment

                            • dogtag
                              Senior Member
                              • Sep 2009
                              • 14985

                              #15
                              Originally posted by rayg
                              Ha, Ha, incident to a legal search warrant and any thing not legal that is also in clear view during the search can be also seized..
                              So, if they're searching for something Big, then something found in a Small drawer is exempt from seizure ?
                              Of course if it's a severed limb it might not pass muster.

                              Comment

                              Working...