That is a substantive reply. Enough so to make me listen to his speech.
Regarding Portland, there is plenty of evidence to support an over-aggressive DHS response, the most obvious being that the Oregon State Police are protecting the property while encountering a gradual calming, night over night. Obama probably did his homework, made a few inquiries before writing that part of his eulogy. He certainly will understand the chains of command at issue. But I have to ask...is it really poisonous or divisive to remind people that there are still Bull Connors out there? (We have a few here at the forum, but for the fact they command nobody but themselves.) I fail to see how the basic message IT CAN HAPPEN AGAIN UNLESS WE ARE VIGILANT is divisive, except to those who DO want it to happen again. If you see my point.
Regarding Portland, there is plenty of evidence to support an over-aggressive DHS response, the most obvious being that the Oregon State Police are protecting the property while encountering a gradual calming, night over night. Obama probably did his homework, made a few inquiries before writing that part of his eulogy. He certainly will understand the chains of command at issue. But I have to ask...is it really poisonous or divisive to remind people that there are still Bull Connors out there? (We have a few here at the forum, but for the fact they command nobody but themselves.) I fail to see how the basic message IT CAN HAPPEN AGAIN UNLESS WE ARE VIGILANT is divisive, except to those who DO want it to happen again. If you see my point.

Comment