Wisconsin Statute 948.60

[lyman]

Lyman my position around here on felons with guns is pretty clear. You've even attacked me for it, saying I'm too overzealous about the problem, want to inconvenience law abiding citizens. So no cigar on the guy with the handgun.

Also, I'm told tattoos are okay, nothing to judge.

Not a lawyer but I am interested in how the statutes of armed self defense will play out here. If someone is not supposed to have a firearm, can they legally defend themselves with one? And if they're caught fleeing the site where they shot someone, a shooting ultimately judged illegal, and they're attacked and start shooting again, is that citizens bringing down an armed suspect or an individual defending themself? Because Rittenhouse wanted to be a cop someday, he doesn't get the presumption of being pure of heart. Guys do flunk out of the program because they don't pass the psych exam. And as a minor he's on shaky legal ground with the firearm.

your folks will try to get him put in jail, and toss the key,

and new tattoo felon with handgun will likely walk ,

if your folks have their way,

[togor]

your folks will try to get him put in jail, and toss the key,

and new tattoo felon with handgun will likely walk ,

if your folks have their way,

Yeah right, they're "my folks" now. Doing that now, huh?

One guy, not supposed to be in possession of a firearm, killed two people, wounded a third. He took two lives, even if "your folks" don't think that ought to matter.

The other guy, felon with a firearm. If he's still under court supervision he's probably going back to jail, could already be there. Otherwise up to 10 years under Wisconsin law. Did he discharge it that night? I don't know.

As a guy in a rural or semi-rural region, you know there are felons out there in the countryside who have firearms. For protection. I assume you're fine with it.

[lyman]

Yeah right, they're "my folks" now. Doing that now, huh?

One guy, not supposed to be in possession of a firearm, killed two people, wounded a third. He took two lives, even if "your folks" don't think that ought to matter.

The other guy, felon with a firearm. If he's still under court supervision he's probably going back to jail, could already be there. Otherwise up to 10 years under Wisconsin law. Did he discharge it that night? I don't know.

As a guy in a rural or semi-rural region, you know there are felons out there in the countryside who have firearms. For protection. I assume you're fine with it.

your folks like those with the D behind their name,

the one's yall elected,

discharge or not, felon is a felon an a felon with a gun is a no no,

and no, not if they are smart, not even a black powder, cause they tend to lock felons up down here with firearms, when caught,