Denver Shooting

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • togor
    Banned
    • Nov 2009
    • 17610

    #1

    Denver Shooting

    Sequence of photos here.

    https://nypost.com/2020/10/11/photos...nver-protests/

    The deceased appeared to be there in a mood for a fight.

    If LEOs get slapped and hit with spray, then it's a given that they will defend themselves with lethal force. If Rittenhouse was defending himself, so is this guy, right?
  • Roadkingtrax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 7835

    #2
    The shooter has the wrong badge. Otherwise he would be on paid leave, counseling, and a return to service date.
    Last edited by Roadkingtrax; 10-13-2020, 11:48.
    "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

    Comment

    • Dolt
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2011
      • 543

      #3
      Originally posted by togor
      Sequence of photos here.

      https://nypost.com/2020/10/11/photos...nver-protests/

      The deceased appeared to be there in a mood for a fight.

      If LEOs get slapped and hit with spray, then it's a given that they will defend themselves with lethal force. If Rittenhouse was defending himself, so is this guy, right?
      A couple things togy...this guy was not law enforcement or even licensed to be a security guard, which the city of Denver requires. Rittenhouse was chased and assaulted by what could be construed as a deadly weapon if used to strike a person with. Also, this murderer was colluding with his boss at 9 news and a reporter to start a disturbance.

      You make yourself look silly when you spout forth without the facts. We love you regardless, like a disturbed little brother. Sort of a mascot!
      Read, think, UNDERSTAND, comment

      Comment

      • Johnny P
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 6269

        #4
        A police officer has to be under a significant threat of serious bodily injury or death to themselves or others to use deadly force. The Rent-A-Cop panicked under pressure and killed the other guy. Screwed up his life for sure as well as the dead guy's family.

        Comment

        • Sandpebble
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2017
          • 2196

          #5
          Originally posted by Dolt
          A couple things togy...this guy was not law enforcement or even licensed to be a security guard, which the city of Denver requires. Rittenhouse was chased and assaulted by what could be construed as a deadly weapon if used to strike a person with. Also, this murderer was colluding with his boss at 9 news and a reporter to start a disturbance.

          You make yourself look silly when you spout forth without the facts. We love you regardless, like a disturbed little brother. Sort of a mascot!
          That's an interesting statement Dolt....

          Rittenhouse wasn't law enforcement either.... nor licence'd security guard .

          He was {is} a minor who illegally transported a fire arm across state lines in order to play militia/cop. He deliberately put himself in harms way and someone died because he wanted to play the game .

          Don't give me that crap that Rittenhouse was defending himself ...... His games may have ruined his life ... but they ended others.

          He'll be a bumboy now, and that's what he deserves

          Comment

          • Vern Humphrey
            Administrator - OFC
            • Aug 2009
            • 15875

            #6
            Originally posted by Dolt
            You make yourself look silly when you spout forth without the facts. We love you regardless, like a disturbed little brother.
            But we really wish Mom would put him in therapy.

            Comment

            • lyman
              Administrator - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 11297

              #7
              Originally posted by Sandpebble
              That's an interesting statement Dolt....

              Rittenhouse wasn't law enforcement either.... nor licence'd security guard .

              He was {is} a minor who illegally transported a fire arm across state lines in order to play militia/cop. He deliberately put himself in harms way and someone died because he wanted to play the game .

              Don't give me that crap that Rittenhouse was defending himself ...... His games may have ruined his life ... but they ended others.

              He'll be a bumboy now, and that's what he deserves
              so getting whacked by a skateboard and having someone pull a gun on you is OK??


              the denver story will make it to the bottom on page 13 by weeks end, even if the family of the guy pursues legal action ,

              and the Denver wanna be not quite pinkerton dude will likely get off, and may be found in a dumpster, or out in the woods in due time

              film at 11

              Comment

              • togor
                Banned
                • Nov 2009
                • 17610

                #8
                Originally posted by Johnny P
                A police officer has to be under a significant threat of serious bodily injury or death to themselves or others to use deadly force. The Rent-A-Cop panicked under pressure and killed the other guy. Screwed up his life for sure as well as the dead guy's family.
                Getting hit with spray or taser is considered sufficient force against an LEO on the reasoning that if disabled he may lose control of his firearm. And the threat need only exist in his mind and not in actuality (see Castile, Philando).

                Dolt I am unable to see how Rittenhouse was under greater threat than this guy when each pulled their trigger.

                Wondering if I am in fact seeing what I think I'm seeing, which is that when it comes to street violence, Trump people are heroes, victims, martyrs, but never in the wrong.
                Last edited by togor; 10-13-2020, 03:02.

                Comment

                • lyman
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 11297

                  #9
                  Originally posted by togor
                  Getting hit with spray or taser is considered sufficient force against an LEO on the reasoning that if disabled he may lose control of his firearm. And the threat need only exist in his mind and not in actuality (see Castile, Philando).

                  Dolt I am unable to see how Rittenhouse was under greater threat than this guy when each pulled their trigger.

                  Wondering if I am in fact seeing what I think I'm seeing, which is that when it comes to street violence, Trump people are heroes, victims, martyrs, but never in the wrong.
                  but you miss the point,


                  you don't see Trump people peacefully tossing brinks, tearing sh!t up, and beating people,, burning things, taking over city centers etc,

                  Comment

                  • togor
                    Banned
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 17610

                    #10
                    Originally posted by lyman
                    you don't see Trump people peacefully tossing brinks, tearing sh!t up, and beating people,, burning things, taking over city centers etc,
                    That is true. They are not out there protesting excess police violence, with the extra stuff going on because of hotheads and opportunists.

                    But there is a curious aspect to their absence. They protest the government tyranny of being asked to wear masks. And show up heavily armed to their demonstrations. And yet when a group of people who actually does experience real government tyranny at the hands of police decides to protest, they're dead set against that. Doesn't anyone wonder why that is?

                    Comment

                    • clintonhater
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2015
                      • 5220

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Dolt
                      We love you regardless, like a disturbed little brother. Sort of a mascot!
                      "WE"?

                      Comment

                      • lyman
                        Administrator - OFC
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 11297

                        #12
                        Originally posted by togor
                        That is true. They are not out there protesting excess police violence, with the extra stuff going on because of hotheads and opportunists.

                        But there is a curious aspect to their absence. They protest the government tyranny of being asked to wear masks. And show up heavily armed to their demonstrations. And yet when a group of people who actually does experience real government tyranny at the hands of police decides to protest, they're dead set against that. Doesn't anyone wonder why that is?
                        hmm,,


                        apples, oranges,

                        Comment

                        • clintonhater
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2015
                          • 5220

                          #13
                          Originally posted by togor
                          And yet when a group of people who actually does experience real government tyranny at the hands of police decides to protest, they're dead set against that.
                          What group is that? Gang-bangers, dope-heads, rioters, arsonists? Don't pick fights with cops, or defy their orders, & you can escape the tyranny.
                          Last edited by clintonhater; 10-13-2020, 05:56.

                          Comment

                          • Johnny P
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 6269

                            #14
                            Getting hit with spray or taser is considered sufficient force against an LEO on the reasoning that if disabled he may lose control of his firearm. And the threat need only exist in his mind and not in actuality (see Castile, Philando).

                            The cops don't do anything even when confronted by physical violence, and what may or might happen is no excuse for killing someone, at least in the United States.

                            Comment

                            • togor
                              Banned
                              • Nov 2009
                              • 17610

                              #15
                              Originally posted by lyman
                              hmm,,


                              apples, oranges,
                              Apple flavored v. orange flavored tyranny?

                              Never heard that one before.

                              Comment

                              Working...