interesting article

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lyman
    Administrator - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 11269

    #1

    interesting article

    thought some may find this interesting


  • Roadkingtrax
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 7835

    #2
    They should tell the FBI. Since the website is linked to anti-Semetic material...maybe they already know?
    "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

    Comment

    • lyman
      Administrator - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 11269

      #3
      you know they do,

      the website will be blacklisted for raciss likely, the FBI will go back to sleep

      Comment

      • Roadkingtrax
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 7835

        #4
        Originally posted by lyman
        you know they do,

        the website will be blacklisted for raciss likely, the FBI will go back to sleep
        Just looking out for you. Though not required by law in all of them, all battleground states should require a recount and validation. Efforts are further hampered by the largest voter participation in over a century.

        I find it interesting that the logistical resources in place could only handle the normal 50-60% of the voting public. The polls were overwhelmingly optimistic, so too the voting infrastructure. I hope this means greater participation in the future. All is not lost.
        "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

        Comment

        • togor
          Banned
          • Nov 2009
          • 17610

          #5
          From the article, re: Milwaukee

          The increase in Democrats relative to Republicans was significantly higher when the Democrat was doing worse overall in early counting. Within each ward, late votes broke heavily to the Democrat in exactly the races where they are likely to affect the result.
          No sh*t, Sherlock!

          Democrats voted early, Republicans didn't. Absentee ballots (processed exactly the same as in-person early in Wisconsin) were run later in the day or the next day. The more pronounced the imbalance in a district, the more dramatic the shift in the counts over time.

          As for counts, the live updates are unofficial, and there is noise in yhe reporting and the tabulations. But eventually it all settled down.

          The great unanswered question is why not steal the Senate too, and why lose seats in the House, if one side has this magic vote machine. The GOP in WI, MI, PA has been tightening voting rules for a decade. They're tighter than ever. Sometimes a guy just loses. Even Scott Walker will say as much about WI.

          Comment

          • lyman
            Administrator - OFC
            • Aug 2009
            • 11269

            #6
            thanks,

            was reading a thread elsewhere (another gun forum) and a member posted that link,


            interesting article , despite the site's creator's issues,


            I also found it interesting the number of folks (blagowhathisface for example) that have put out interviews or articles stating cheating was rampant,


            thing is, we will never know for sure, or be able to prove it, one way or the other,

            Comment

            • togor
              Banned
              • Nov 2009
              • 17610

              #7
              Originally posted by lyman
              thing is, we will never know for sure, or be able to prove it, one way or the other,
              Wrong.

              The paper ballots are there. Run them again if necessary but in WI at least, the error in recent statewide recounts, including 2016, was a few hundred votes.

              I hate that "we'll never know" attitude because it reeks of mediocrity, that basic mechanisms of governance, like running elections, are somehow beyond our control. This is not Eastern effing Europe.
              Last edited by togor; 11-08-2020, 09:29.

              Comment

              • barretcreek
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2013
                • 6065

                #8
                Several articles referring to Benford's Law. A statistical tool to identify anomalies. Best of all, they have been censored by Twitter and other S&M sites.

                I'll link.





                GOING ALL OUT TO STOP THE SIGNAL: Last night Facebook wouldn’t let me post this link on Biden’s votes and Benford’s Law. It just didn’t work. They blocked the Bit.ly version too. Now several people report that trying to post it produces a claim that it’s blocked for “adult sexual exploitation,” which it has nothing to do with.
                Last edited by barretcreek; 11-08-2020, 09:51.

                Comment

                • lyman
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 11269

                  #9
                  Originally posted by togor
                  Wrong.

                  The paper ballots are there. Run them again if necessary but in WI at least, the error in recent statewide recounts, including 2016, was a few hundred votes.

                  I hate that "we'll never know" attitude because it reeks of mediocrity, that basic mechanisms of governance, like running elections, are somehow beyond our control. This is not Eastern effing Europe.
                  you may hate that , but the fact is , just cause the paper ballots are there, does not mean they are not compromised or fake
                  so run them all you want, it they are bad/false/whatever you wanna call them ballots,, you still get the same result with the same taint,

                  Comment

                  • togor
                    Banned
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 17610

                    #10
                    Originally posted by lyman
                    you may hate that , but the fact is , just cause the paper ballots are there, does not mean they are not compromised or fake
                    so run them all you want, it they are bad/false/whatever you wanna call them ballots,, you still get the same result with the same taint,
                    When did you lose faith in elections?

                    Comment

                    • lyman
                      Administrator - OFC
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 11269

                      #11
                      sometime in the late 90's

                      Comment

                      • TomSudz
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 3676

                        #12
                        2001
                        I dream of a better world. One where chickens may cross the road without their motives being questioned.

                        Comment

                        Working...