thought some may find this interesting
interesting article
Collapse
X
-
They should tell the FBI. Since the website is linked to anti-Semetic material...maybe they already know?"The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman -
Just looking out for you. Though not required by law in all of them, all battleground states should require a recount and validation. Efforts are further hampered by the largest voter participation in over a century.
I find it interesting that the logistical resources in place could only handle the normal 50-60% of the voting public. The polls were overwhelmingly optimistic, so too the voting infrastructure. I hope this means greater participation in the future. All is not lost."The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. UllmanComment
-
From the article, re: Milwaukee
No sh*t, Sherlock!The increase in Democrats relative to Republicans was significantly higher when the Democrat was doing worse overall in early counting. Within each ward, late votes broke heavily to the Democrat in exactly the races where they are likely to affect the result.
Democrats voted early, Republicans didn't. Absentee ballots (processed exactly the same as in-person early in Wisconsin) were run later in the day or the next day. The more pronounced the imbalance in a district, the more dramatic the shift in the counts over time.
As for counts, the live updates are unofficial, and there is noise in yhe reporting and the tabulations. But eventually it all settled down.
The great unanswered question is why not steal the Senate too, and why lose seats in the House, if one side has this magic vote machine. The GOP in WI, MI, PA has been tightening voting rules for a decade. They're tighter than ever. Sometimes a guy just loses. Even Scott Walker will say as much about WI.Comment
-
thanks,
was reading a thread elsewhere (another gun forum) and a member posted that link,
interesting article , despite the site's creator's issues,
I also found it interesting the number of folks (blagowhathisface for example) that have put out interviews or articles stating cheating was rampant,
thing is, we will never know for sure, or be able to prove it, one way or the other,Comment
-
Wrong.
The paper ballots are there. Run them again if necessary but in WI at least, the error in recent statewide recounts, including 2016, was a few hundred votes.
I hate that "we'll never know" attitude because it reeks of mediocrity, that basic mechanisms of governance, like running elections, are somehow beyond our control. This is not Eastern effing Europe.Last edited by togor; 11-08-2020, 09:29.Comment
-
Several articles referring to Benford's Law. A statistical tool to identify anomalies. Best of all, they have been censored by Twitter and other S&M sites.
I'll link.
GOING ALL OUT TO STOP THE SIGNAL: Last night Facebook wouldn’t let me post this link on Biden’s votes and Benford’s Law. It just didn’t work. They blocked the Bit.ly version too. Now several people report that trying to post it produces a claim that it’s blocked for “adult sexual exploitation,” which it has nothing to do with.Last edited by barretcreek; 11-08-2020, 09:51.Comment
-
you may hate that , but the fact is , just cause the paper ballots are there, does not mean they are not compromised or fakeWrong.
The paper ballots are there. Run them again if necessary but in WI at least, the error in recent statewide recounts, including 2016, was a few hundred votes.
I hate that "we'll never know" attitude because it reeks of mediocrity, that basic mechanisms of governance, like running elections, are somehow beyond our control. This is not Eastern effing Europe.
so run them all you want, it they are bad/false/whatever you wanna call them ballots,, you still get the same result with the same taint,Comment
-
When did you lose faith in elections?Comment

Comment