U.S. Air Force pilot looks at a KC-135 aerial refueling aircraft as he refuels over E

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RED
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 11689

    #1

    U.S. Air Force pilot looks at a KC-135 aerial refueling aircraft as he refuels over E

    Feb. 17, 2022 1:12 pm ET



    When the US air forces need to be at their best, they are not combat ready. 1/2 our F-22 s are awaiting parts or maintenance.
  • togor
    Banned
    • Nov 2009
    • 17610

    #2
    Well if the sequester hangover is true, then slashing the burn rate by getting out of Afghanistan is a good first step.

    But jeepers, $700B/yr defense budget ought to buy a little flight time after all the toilet seats, right?
    Last edited by togor; 02-19-2022, 05:49.

    Comment

    • RED
      Very Senior Member - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 11689

      #3
      Originally posted by togor
      Well if the sequester hangover is true, then slashing the burn rate by getting out of Afghanistan is a good first step.

      But jeepers, $700B/yr defense budget ought to buy a little flight time after all the toilet seats, right?
      I am sure you did not know this, but there are no toilets or toilet seats aboard any of the F-22, F-35, FA-18, F-16, F-15, A-10 combat aircraft.

      Maybe if the military would spend money on training combat aviators instead of spending millions on transgender operations, pregnancy leave, and classes to teach military officers how to overthrow the government.
      Last edited by RED; 02-19-2022, 09:00. Reason: Mostake

      Comment

      • Art
        Senior Member, Deceased
        • Dec 2009
        • 9256

        #4
        There are those, usually on the left, who complain about things like Air Force flyovers at football games as a waste of money. Anytime flying the aircraft is training, and IIRC the 'gubmint charges a fee for the service.

        Comment

        • lyman
          Administrator - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 11294

          #5
          Originally posted by Art
          There are those, usually on the left, who complain about things like Air Force flyovers at football games as a waste of money. Anytime flying the aircraft is training, and IIRC the 'gubmint charges a fee for the service.
          fee or not, it is as you say Training,
          also gives John Q Public a chance to see what he/she/they are paying for,

          ditto Air Shows and the like,

          passive recruiting is another way to look at it,

          Comment

          • Vern Humphrey
            Administrator - OFC
            • Aug 2009
            • 15875

            #6
            I happen to know about the $700 toilet seat. Congress, years ago, canceled a program and did not get the savings they expected -- because it is the FIRST aircraft that is the most expensive. All the R&D has been done, and that is the huge cost driver.

            Congress then decreed that everything should be pro-rated. Including tools and spare parts. So every nut and bolt carries some of the R&D costs. But how do you do that? Congress said "straight line it." That toiled seat, therefore carries a huge R&D burden.

            Comment

            • togor
              Banned
              • Nov 2009
              • 17610

              #7
              Originally posted by RED
              I am sure you did not know this, but there are no toilets or toilet seats aboard any of the F-22, F-35, FA-18, F-16, F-15, A-10 combat aircraft.

              Maybe if the military would spend money on training combat aviators instead of spending millions on transgender operations, pregnancy leave, and classes to teach military officers how to overthrow the government.
              It's an appropriations joke, how much the military spends on certain items of hardware. Toilet seats, coffee makers, appliances, etc.

              One thing they don't spend it on lately is dentists.
              My son has a friend in the Navy, he has to come home to the family dentist to get regular checkups. .

              Comment

              • togor
                Banned
                • Nov 2009
                • 17610

                #8
                And the fact remains, $700B/yr ought to buy enough training missions, so maybe money isn't the issue. Maybe the problem is the Pentagon keeps cramming 10 pounds of sh*t into a 5 pound bag and the result is planes on the ground in constant need of repair. If that's the case don't blame the shemales or the wokes.

                Comment

                • lyman
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 11294

                  #9
                  Originally posted by togor
                  It's an appropriations joke, how much the military spends on certain items of hardware. Toilet seats, coffee makers, appliances, etc.

                  One thing they don't spend it on lately is dentists.
                  My son has a friend in the Navy, he has to come home to the family dentist to get regular checkups. .
                  military dentists are few and far between and have been for ages,

                  many folks I know in the service get outside dental work done,

                  Comment

                  • lyman
                    Administrator - OFC
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 11294

                    #10
                    Originally posted by togor
                    And the fact remains, $700B/yr ought to buy enough training missions, so maybe money isn't the issue. Maybe the problem is the Pentagon keeps cramming 10 pounds of sh*t into a 5 pound bag and the result is planes on the ground in constant need of repair. If that's the case don't blame the shemales or the wokes.
                    so is this trolling or ignorance?

                    military folks want the biggest budget slice they can get, and each branch has its Christmas list of new equipment,

                    and folks like you harp on the hammers and toilet seats that cost millions, sometimes rightfully so,

                    the military seems to do best when those things are in balance, and the funds are allocated properly, (spares, training, etc)

                    vs the graft, contract (or contracted) expenditures etc including waste of time feel good crap (I have a good friend a year or 2 from retirement, he tells me the BS is getting a bit too deep in the USAR)
                    is what costs too much usually, and what needs to be controlled,

                    Comment

                    • barretcreek
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2013
                      • 6065

                      #11
                      The $700 toilet seats and $2500 coffee makers were how the Pentagon hid the R&D on the Stealth program.

                      Comment

                      Working...