How can they "Expand" a background check ? ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dogtag
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 14985

    #1

    How can they "Expand" a background check ? ...

    What do they check now, to see if you're a felon ?
    Or maybe there's a record of your having been confined in a nut house for a spell ?
    What else can they check and from where would they get the info ?
    Watch out they don't broach the 4th.
    The term seems more like hot air than a viable plan.
  • lyman
    Administrator - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 11269

    #2
    expand means delays, as in they will want waiting periods next


    NICS works, but like all Computer programs, it only works as good as the data it can read,


    if you remember, the Ft Hood shooter passed a background check, that he would not have if the Gov't had input the correct info into the system.....

    Comment

    • togor
      Banned
      • Nov 2009
      • 17610

      #3
      They can require all transfers go through NICS, and they can (wait for it) start keeping transactions online for law enforcement purposes. See who is buying what and how often.

      Really want to kill the romance with ARs? Don't ban them! Just require fingerprints on file with the Feds.

      Doubt we see these things this time around.

      Comment

      • RED
        Very Senior Member - OFC
        • Aug 2009
        • 11689

        #4
        And what would fingerprints reveal that a NCIS check does not? A straw purchase would not be stopped unless the straw dog was already in the system.

        Lets get it straight. You are for eliminating the entire Bill of Rights and making the purchase of any firearm illegal for anybody that has not voted Democrat in the previous election. Conservatives and anybody not on the Pre-Approved list dictated by the DNC is ineligible to own a firearm.

        Only the decibels and elite to be allowed rights.

        The problem you have with that is that most of the shootings are done by lefties. And, NO, just because a shooter is not a registered voter does not eliminate him as a leftie.

        Comment

        • Art
          Senior Member, Deceased
          • Dec 2009
          • 9256

          #5
          They could have everyone go through the same procedure as CHL applicants. That would gum up the works. Talk about a waiting period!!!

          To get a CHL in Texas you have to be fingerprinted and have a DPS (State Police) and FBI record check. I don't know if the FBI does AFIS (Automated Fingerprint Information System) check on CHL applications, but the AFIS computer will kick out a hit on, for example, a partial thumb print. You can not hide from AFIS and I used to get results in a day. If you've ever been fingerprinted in the good old US of A you'll get an AFIS return.

          Do they run AFIS on CHL applications? I have no idea. If they did they'd clear a lot of cases.

          Red is right about straw purchasers, many, perhaps most gang member's guns are bought by girlfriends. How many young minority women do big city attorneys really want to lock up for straw purchases?
          Last edited by Art; 06-05-2022, 06:10.

          Comment

          • togor
            Banned
            • Nov 2009
            • 17610

            #6
            RED I am making an observation.

            And you of course are running off into the briar patch like a fool who lost his head. No surprise there

            Why would fingerprints kill the romance? Because they put someone "in the system", just for buying an AR.

            You know as well as I do how some people think.

            Comment

            • lyman
              Administrator - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 11269

              #7
              Originally posted by togor
              They can require all transfers go through NICS, and they can (wait for it) start keeping transactions online for law enforcement purposes. See who is buying what and how often.

              Really want to kill the romance with ARs? Don't ban them! Just require fingerprints on file with the Feds.

              Doubt we see these things this time around.
              well, when was the last time you did a transfer or background check?

              the Feds only know you bought a handgun, long gun, or other,
              unless they come looking for the serial number at the dealer,, they do not know what you bought,


              you have mentioned in the past you would like AR's to go NFA,

              are you willing to submit all your semi auto's to the NFA registry, and do a form 4 on each? C&R or not?

              - - - Updated - - -

              Originally posted by Art
              They could have everyone go through the same procedure as CHL applicants. That would gum up the works. Talk about a waiting period!!!

              To get a CHL in Texas you have to be fingerprinted and have a DPS (State Police) and FBI record check. I don't know if the FBI does AFIS (Automated Fingerprint Information System) check on CHL applications, but the AFIS computer will kick out a hit on, for example, a partial thumb print. You can not hide from AFIS and I used to get results in a day. If you've ever been fingerprinted in the good old US of A you'll get an AFIS return.

              Do they run AFIS on CHL applications? I have no idea. If they did they'd clear a lot of cases.

              Red is right about straw purchasers, many, perhaps most gang member's guns are bought by girlfriends. How many young minority women do big city attorneys really want to lock up for straw purchases?
              Va, a shall issue state, does Fingerprints on new CHL permits, or used to,

              I have not had to submit any for my re ups, in quite a few years (had a CCW since the mid 80's, when they were may issue, not shall issue)

              - - - Updated - - -

              Originally posted by togor
              RED I am making an observation.

              And you of course are running off into the briar patch like a fool who lost his head. No surprise there

              Why would fingerprints kill the romance? Because they put someone "in the system", just for buying an AR.

              You know as well as I do how some people think.
              it's called trolling, and name calling, and you continue to do it,

              you have called for NFA type AR rules in the past, and continue to do so,

              the NFA branch was overwhelmed years ago when Silencers got hot, and are still a bit overwhelmed, even with contractors in place,

              flooding the system with AR (btw, Colt AR's or any generic AR type maker,, since none call them AR-15's legally except Colt??) or any semi auto would make the system and it's delays last years,

              esp since the Biden Admin has slowed down the ATF, from licensing to NFA,,, and yes,, that is a fact

              Comment

              • togor
                Banned
                • Nov 2009
                • 17610

                #8
                I see the problem here.

                People assume that if someone states an idea, they must be for it.

                There's this thing called "strategic thinking", where one even--get this--thinks about their opponents moves, and/or the weaknesses in one's own position. In order to devise countermeasures. Wild, huh?

                Do you think I WANT to give my fingerprints to the Feds as the price of keeping my semi-autos? Having gone this far in life with no ink stains?

                Sheesh.

                Comment

                • lyman
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 11269

                  #9
                  Originally posted by togor
                  I see the problem here.

                  People assume that if someone states an idea, they must be for it.

                  There's this thing called "strategic thinking", where one even--get this--thinks about their opponents moves, and/or the weaknesses in one's own position. In order to devise countermeasures. Wild, huh?

                  Do you think I WANT to give my fingerprints to the Feds as the price of keeping my semi-autos? Having gone this far in life with no ink stains?

                  Sheesh.
                  strategic thinking or hoping it comes true?

                  your past indicates that the strategic part was a wish, not a strategy, go back and read your own posts,


                  I am not worried about ink stains, the feds have had mine since 1984, however I don't think they need more copies for semi autos,,, ever

                  Comment

                  • Major Tom
                    Very Senior Member - OFC
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 6181

                    #10
                    Togor calling RED "a fool" and no consequence by going against the 'rules' set for this forum?

                    Comment

                    • Roadkingtrax
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2010
                      • 7835

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Major Tom
                      Togor calling RED "a fool" and no consequence by going against the 'rules' set for this forum?
                      Easy there Iowan.
                      "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                      Comment

                      • Major Tom
                        Very Senior Member - OFC
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 6181

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Roadkingtrax
                        Easy there Iowan.
                        I guess 'some' can ignore the rules?

                        Comment

                        • barretcreek
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2013
                          • 6065

                          #13
                          A 1000% Excise Tax on semi autos will probably eliminate that concern.

                          Comment

                          • M1Tommy
                            Very Senior Member - OFC
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 1027

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Major Tom
                            Togor calling RED "a fool" and no consequence by going against the 'rules' set for this forum?
                            I hear you well, and wonder this also. I cannot really fathom why he is even here.
                            Sincerely,
                            Tommy

                            Comment

                            • Roadkingtrax
                              Senior Member
                              • Feb 2010
                              • 7835

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Major Tom
                              I guess 'some' can ignore the rules?
                              Consider the latitude you have had in the past for much greater violations.

                              Have a blessed day.
                              "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                              Comment

                              Working...