Pro-choice protesters burn American flag after Roe v. Wade reversal

[Vern Humphrey]

what rights togor?

He can't answer that. I've challenged them to show me where the right to murder an unborn infant is found in the Constitution, and they can't do it.

Here's a hint: Wherever it is, it ISN'T in the 14th Amendment, and the 14th Amendment does NOT define "person."

[Roadkingtrax]

He can't answer that. I've challenged them to show me where the right to murder an unborn infant is found in the Constitution, and they can't do it.

Here's a hint: Wherever it is, it ISN'T in the 14th Amendment, and the 14th Amendment does NOT define "person."

It rests with the states.

[Allen]

He can't answer that. I've challenged them to show me where the right to murder an unborn infant is found in the Constitution, and they can't do it.

Here's a hint: Wherever it is, it ISN'T in the 14th Amendment, and the 14th Amendment does NOT define "person."

That's why the democrats want to ignore and re-write the whole constitution. I doesn't fit their lifestyle as it is.

[Roadkingtrax]

That's why the democrats want to ignore and re-write the whole constitution. I doesn't fit their lifestyle as it is.

.

[togor]

What right?

Seriously?

You guys really that detached from the realities of the situation that you have to echo each other's ignorance?

The right to privacy. Specifically, in one's own medical decisions. That's not a right, you say? Tell that to all of the people who didn't want the government forcing COVID shots! I mean, for goodness sake, they even appropriated the pro-choice language to their own cause.

Do the anti-vaxxers feel as though their rights are rooted in the Constitution, or do they not??

And remember, whether YOU THINK CHOICE WAS A RIGHT OR NOT ISN'T THE POINT.

The point is, it WAS a right, according to the law, until the law TOOK IT AWAY.

Something was taken away from Americans. As a matter of principle, do you want them to accept this meekly or be hopping mad about it?

- - - Updated - - -

That's why Trumpworld wants to ignore and re-write the whole constitution. It doesn't fit their lifestyle as it is.

FIFY

[togor]

He can't answer that. I've challenged them to show me where the right to murder an unborn infant is found in the Constitution, and they can't do it.

Here's a hint: Wherever it is, it ISN'T in the 14th Amendment, and the 14th Amendment does NOT define "person."

Read my post and comment if you can.

We both know you're afraid of a straight up debate with me on the issues.

Would forced medical procedures be against the Constitution? And would it be Constitutional to deny medical treatment? Could a state ban the practice of setting broken limbs? The right to have one's broken bones set is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

Neither is the word "unborn". The word "born" is however. People have to be born for the constitution to kick in. You deny it?

[lyman]

What right?

Seriously?

You guys really that detached from the realities of the situation that you have to echo each other's ignorance?

The right to privacy. Specifically, in one's own medical decisions. That's not a right, you say? Tell that to all of the people who didn't want the government forcing COVID shots! I mean, for goodness sake, they even appropriated the pro-choice language to their own cause.

Do the anti-vaxxers feel as though their rights are rooted in the Constitution, or do they not??

And remember, whether YOU THINK CHOICE WAS A RIGHT OR NOT ISN'T THE POINT.

The point is, it WAS a right, according to the law, until the law TOOK IT AWAY.

Something was taken away from Americans. As a matter of principle, do you want them to accept this meekly or be hopping mad about it?

- - - Updated - - -



FIFY

show us what right was violated and removed,


if you can


and the FIFY,, nope, that is another fabrication of the left


you get your undies all in a was over so much,,,,

- - - Updated - - -

Read my post and comment if you can.

We both know you're afraid of a straight up debate with me on the issues.

Would forced medical procedures be against the Constitution? And would it be Constitutional to deny medical treatment? Could a state ban the practice of setting broken limbs? The right to have one's broken bones set is not specifically mentioned in the Constitution.

Neither is the word "unborn". The word "born" is however. People have to be born for the constitution to kick in. You deny it?

put up or shut up, and no one here is afraid of you

[Vern Humphrey]

show us what right was violated and removed,


if you can


and the FIFY,, nope, that is another fabrication of the left


you get your undies all in a was over so much,,,,

- - - Updated - - -



put up or shut up, and no one here is afraid of you

He's back to the old fallacy of claiming the 14th Amendment defines "personhood." It doesn't. It defines "citizen." And no one can deny that non-citizens have rights.

[lyman]

He's back to the old fallacy of claiming the 14th Amendment defines "personhood." It doesn't. It defines "citizen." And no one can deny that non-citizens have rights.

but Vern,, we all are trembling in our boots, afraid his so called superior intellect will trample all over us,

[Vern Humphrey]

but Vern,, we all are trembling in our boots, afraid his so called superior intellect will trample all over us,

If only I had his mind. I'd flush it.

[Allen]

If only I had his mind. I'd flush it.

What septic tank would accept it?

[Vern Humphrey]

What septic tank would accept it?

Good point. Can you imagine the overflow?

[Allen]

Good point. Can you imagine the overflow?

Niagara Falls huh?

[Vern Humphrey]

Niagara Falls huh?

If Niagra Falls was brown and had a powerful odor.

[Roadkingtrax]

Yeah...Allen/Gunsmoke/??? is high on the red flag list. /sarc