The answer to the abortion issue was broadcast in 1975.

[RED]

The idea that a single pharmacist working at a Walmart pharmacy can keep the other 10,000 pharmacists that fill prescriptions at Wally World from doing so. No woman with a brain has ever been denied the pill because every pharmacist refused to fill the prescription. Only a hating left wing radical would make that case.

How about naming a single Walgreen store that has refused to fill a birth control pill.

[togor]

and you proved my point before I even typed out my reply

You're limited to snippy comments like this because every time you actually try to reason out an argument, a gem pops out.

Your latest pellet is that RBG somehow opposed the Constitutional right to an abortion. Maybe you believe that because it that's what they told you at the meetings. However even 5 minutes of "doing the research" would have set you straight.

But we both know that with you, the straight story is NOT the point. The straight story is to be avoided at all costs. Because whenever people have their head on straight, your kind loses.

[togor]

The idea that a single pharmacist working at a Walmart pharmacy can keep the other 10,000 pharmacists that fill prescriptions at Wally World from doing so. No woman with a brain has ever been denied the pill because every pharmacist refused to fill the prescription. Only a hating left wing radical would make that case.

How about naming a single Walgreen store that has refused to fill a birth control pill.

The point raised was that some people object to the pill.

It was challenged, and substantiated, so now we're on to:

"well, not that many people hate the pill!"

Guessing you didn't know that law was on the books in your state when you wrote the post?

I see a different principle, that if someone is going to go into business serving the public, then they ought to serve the public.

Your religion doesn't like it? Fine, don't take it. But the pharmacy isn't church.

[lyman]

You're limited to snippy comments like this because every time you actually try to reason out an argument, a gem pops out.

Your latest pellet is that RBG somehow opposed the Constitutional right to an abortion. Maybe you believe that because it that's what they told you at the meetings. However even 5 minutes of "doing the research" would have set you straight.

But we both know that with you, the straight story is NOT the point. The straight story is to be avoided at all costs. Because whenever people have their head on straight, your kind loses.

couple things here,

OK,

for starters I post probably 2-4x's what RKT does in word count, yet I am limited to snippy comments,

shows how much of a double standard you can have,


and,



take a break from reading the headlines on MSNBC or Vox, and do a simple google search,

Ruth Bader Ginsbery Roe bad law

then tell me where she was 100% for it and show me the link to the thread that shows I said she (RBG) opposed the Constitutional Right to an Abortion,



so you got a choice,

admit to being a troll, one that can't even get the facts straight,

or post up some proof,




I'm betting you will hide for a day or so , get orders from your peeps over on the DU , and then avoid the subject, hence, a troll,

[lyman]

still waiting on a answer, or some links,,