And yet another 1868 dated 1868 Springfield...
Collapse
X
-
-
-
-
-
-
Comment
-
Interesting that there is virtually NO extractor impact wear on the block. Ditto with my 62 - evidently they led a sheltered life before being put away after testing. Not really surprising at all with yours, being "not standard", but mine should have been fully ready for issue, yet for some reason it apparently was not.Comment
-
The only stamps or marks on the barrel or receiver are the two 6's and a number 1 on the breech plug.
Attached FilesComment
-
-
The Cleaning Rod Stop is finished in the white. I'll have to remove the band spring and then the stop to see if there is any patent date on it.
This stop probably predates a Patent number though.
I couldn't get the stop to come out because it's in there pretty tight. I'll try again later.
Attached FilesLast edited by Fred; 12-31-2016, 08:45.Comment
-
Well gosh! I've just noticed that the Cleaning Rod on rifle number 6 is significantly Thicker then the Cleaning Rod on rifle number 127.
Attached FilesComment

Comment