Aside from its' rarity, that is a really pretty 1868! A few (expected) dings of course, but virtually no wear.
I'll have to be honest and say that - looking at the first "after" picture - I was appalled by the seemingly rush (as opposed to rushed, an entirely different concept) cleaning job, until I saw the rest of the results. Normally, you don't clean a bright gun because it will look phony. But, that gun was nice enough, under the crud, to pull it off, and now looks really nice. I'm sorely tempted to follow his methods on #62, which is in similar condition. Good job, Fred!
I'll have to be honest and say that - looking at the first "after" picture - I was appalled by the seemingly rush (as opposed to rushed, an entirely different concept) cleaning job, until I saw the rest of the results. Normally, you don't clean a bright gun because it will look phony. But, that gun was nice enough, under the crud, to pull it off, and now looks really nice. I'm sorely tempted to follow his methods on #62, which is in similar condition. Good job, Fred!

Comment