Techie question. (radio slaving strobes)

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Phloating Phlasher
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2023
    • 508

    #16
    Credit issued today!
    Now I know how Odysseus felt when he finally landed on Ithaca.

    Comment

    • Phloating Phlasher
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2023
      • 508

      #17
      One of my other low paid models
      This one I call "Ole FugWit". He has a boozing issue

      Fugwi 4 light 1.jpg

      I didn't really need a 4-light setup for this but I was testing the strobes working together & the radio synch so I used everything. Its a variation on Kodak's old "Wrap-Round Lighting".

      Fugwit 4 light.jpg

      Comment

      • Doc Sharptail
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2023
        • 431

        #18
        Jug is probably worth a bit if it's antique.
        My parents would sing "Little Brown Jug" with Dad on guitar/harmonica and Mom on accordion. They were actually pretty good, and could carry a tune.

        Looks like a Sunpak green ring in the fore-ground. I used a similar set up with 3 lights- umbrellas high and low from left and right, and a smaller (285 at 1/16th power) as a back-kicker. Liked my rear light mounted low behind the subject for extra depth.

        I should investigate back-drop paper and stands, if it hasn't gained too much price wise. There was a gray I liked that was very close to 18%.

        Regards,

        Doc Sharptail

        Comment

        • Phloating Phlasher
          Senior Member
          • Apr 2023
          • 508

          #19
          The jug is far from an antique!
          "Platte Valley" is a bit of a gimmick, but legal "shine" & rather good too. Not "rotgut" but they trade on the reputation.

          Background paper, "Thunder Grey"?

          Mostly Sunpaks!
          "Main" is a 611.on 1/1
          "Wrap" is a 622 on 1/2
          "Hair" is a "383 Super" with the zoom head & bounce card on 1/2
          "Fill" is a Vivitar 5600 with zoom head on "W" with a home made bounce card. Good catch!

          I also have a Vivitar 285HV, but that lives in the gadget bag as a the off camera flash for the Fuji FinePix S 9100.

          I have this oddball grip bracket for it. I've never seen another like it! It has the usual "Vivitar flash bracket" look, but its a Sunpak & fitted with a ball & socket flash shoe! It lets me angle the 285 into "impossible" positions including macro! (the 9100 Has terrible low light~macro performance, one of its few weaknesses)

          9100~285HV.jpg
          Last edited by Phloating Phlasher; 02-16-2024, 03:37.

          Comment

          • Doc Sharptail
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2023
            • 431

            #20


            Sunpak 3600 at left with Nikkormat FTN and Nikkor 50mm f1.4. It takes 6 AA batteries in the top of the head and has a guide number of 36.

            Vivitar 283 at right on the F2 camera with 50mm f2 nikkor H via the AS-1 flash coupler. It's trigger voltage is awfully high at 300+ volts d.c.
            It has the filter diffuser holder, but no plates. Both flashes came in package deals with cameras.

            The Sunpak was not very well thought out in terms of power, unless of course, one had an A/C adapter for it. It eats the double A's pretty quickly on full power manual. I actually sort of like it- the gold backed tube in it is a bit warmer than the Vivitar 285, which is similar in light out-put.



            Nikon SB-22 here on the F2. Guide number is supposedly 28, but in actual use at full power manual, it's closer to 27, and a bit cold temperature wise. Certainly not a very photogenic flash- it's hard to get a decent photo of it with the red A/F sensor control cover taking up most of the front.

            The studio lighting stuff is long gone. The big Bowens mono lights with their A/C power systems, modeling lights, umbrellas and stands made life easy and quick.
            Went with a couple of Metz 60 CT-2's when I got into the medium format/wedding stuff. The battery systems on them were not very reliable. I hear there's a lithium-ion replacement pack available for them now, but know even less about it.

            The back-drop paper we used was actually a kodak made/marketed item, and was actually listed as medium grey. It was fairly neutral, and hair really stood out well in front of it.

            Regards,

            Doc Sharptail
            Last edited by Doc Sharptail; 02-16-2024, 11:44.

            Comment

            • Phloating Phlasher
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2023
              • 508

              #21
              I think "Thunder Grey" was a Larsen-made one?

              Trigger voltages weren't a problem till the Nikon F3 came out IIRC. We had a customer who paid a premium to get the "Firstest, latest & greatest" & fried it the first day!
              The 611 is high at 180 DCv, but I have a couple of "Wein Safesynchs" attached to the 611 sensors & the GX8R ringlflash which use the old 180DCV trigger voltage.
              The 285HV (with its "safe" low voltage trigger) is actually the big problem!

              The "peanut" slaves, & the old HV optical ones were parasitic, they took power from the sync circuit. That was the problem with the "New, Safe" 285HV. They went too far! The 180v wasn't just reduced to 8 DCV, But even lower to 4.5 DCv. Because of that they didn't trigger because of the low input voltage!
              Last edited by Phloating Phlasher; 02-17-2024, 07:24.

              Comment

              • Doc Sharptail
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2023
                • 431

                #22
                Ran into a bit similar problems with "modern" optical slaves not triggering the Sunpak 3600 A/T. Both are less than a year old. They trigger the tiny voltage nikon SB-22 just fine.



                There's a look at my simple 2 bounce flash set-up. It's fine for the smallish subjects, mostly- provided they aren't too reflective.



                With the 180 volt trigger 3600 A/T corded into the p.c. socket on the D-810 on full manual power. The SB-22 was firing at reduced manual "M/D" (motor-drive) off the optical slave. Nikkor 50mm f2 at F5.6 and ISO 64. Un-manipulated except for re-size to fit here.



                Bounce reflections get a little different without a snooted fill. I actually kind of like this accidental effect. Same lens and settings as above.



                Nikkor 200mm Micro f4 at F8 here and ISO 64, full power auto on the Sunpak head. That is the lens on the D-810 in the first photo.

                Toying with the idea of getting a modern flash, but am still pretty well un-decided yet.
                Ideally, I'd end up with something with full and fractional manual control. That old Sunpak 3600 A/T is getting a bit on the wrong side of 40 years old, and my trust in it not frying the camera ain't all that great.
                We shall see a bit later on, especially if there is something at a good price on the used market.

                Regards,

                Doc Sharptail

                Comment

                • Phloating Phlasher
                  Senior Member
                  • Apr 2023
                  • 508

                  #23
                  If you do get new strobes there's an on line DIY page where they show how to make bounce cards with "craft foam", it just straps on with a velcro wrap-strap.
                  You can get the stuff at hobby stores or on-line.
                  All the "nun's wimple" types shown in my earlier pics are from there.

                  DSCF4592.jpg
                  Last edited by Phloating Phlasher; 03-09-2024, 11:13.

                  Comment

                  • Doc Sharptail
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2023
                    • 431

                    #24
                    Your Sunpak handle flash looks to be an up-date(?) over the 3600 A/T.

                    I think I am going to wait until I can find a Nikon unit from the mid to late 80's with a bit more power- something in the G/N 40 (meters) range. I don't really need all the automation of I-TTL and auto focusing heads and reflectors- when it comes to flash, I usually end up going to full manual operation anyways.

                    Regards,

                    Doc Sharptail

                    Comment

                    • Phloating Phlasher
                      Senior Member
                      • Apr 2023
                      • 508

                      #25
                      Its non dedicated, but thyristor auto exposure IIRC 5-stop range & manual power reduction from FULL to 1 /128th.
                      GN in ft is 160 & 100 Iso

                      My other potato masher is the later 622
                      Dedicated (by swapping module only) or auto thyristor/manual with power reduction also from FULL to 1/128, GN in ft is 180/220 (depending on interchangeable head) & & 100 Iso
                      The HUGE advantage to me is the swiveling, tilting & zooming head. "C" cell battery packs are also quick change, but I've never managed to run one down!

                      DSCF4595.jpg
                      Last edited by Phloating Phlasher; 03-08-2024, 03:45.

                      Comment

                      • Doc Sharptail
                        Senior Member
                        • Apr 2023
                        • 431

                        #26
                        I think my particular Sunpak was a short term offering, and likely one of their first "pro-sumer" efforts- aimed of course at the "advanced amateur".

                        Build quality seems a step down from the 422-D shoe mount I gave to my sister. The main fly in all this ointment is the power source. I really can't envision true professional use with this unit, unless the A/C adapter is used.

                        It runs a bit better than I was expecting it to with 6 double "A" NIMH's in it. I can get 32-36 full power manual frames out of them before the capacitor starts slowing due to voltage drop, and about 40-50 full power auto frames. It starts to push a bit on the hard side at low ISO's and smaller aperture values, which some of my better macro lenses require for optimal definition. There is not a lot of on-line reference for the 3600 A/T, which leads me to believe production was fairly short. The rotating swivel head on it is actually pretty useful. I got it without the zoom panel, which is a fairly common occurrence with this design. There are several Vivitar's around with the same missing zoom panel problem.

                        I have a bit of looking around and reading to do yet, before I can find something that will work the way I want, with a bit more power.

                        Regards,

                        Doc Sharptail

                        Comment

                        • Phloating Phlasher
                          Senior Member
                          • Apr 2023
                          • 508

                          #27
                          Agreed, there's a very noticeable build quality drop between the 611 auto & the 622 Pro!

                          Comment

                          • Doc Sharptail
                            Senior Member
                            • Apr 2023
                            • 431

                            #28
                            Found a Nikon SB-600 in a pawn shop at a price I can live with. It has built in slave capabilities that I have yet to look into. Power level is just out of the mediocre at a G/N of 38 and meters. Recycle time is pretty fast compared to the older units, even at full power manual. It definitely likes the upper capacity NIMH's of which it takes 4 of the A/A size. The interesting thing is that it will provide full TTL exposure in program mode with a chipped lens. Probably have more on this later after I've had time to do a bit of work with it.

                            -D.S.

                            Comment

                            • Phloating Phlasher
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2023
                              • 508

                              #29
                              Sounds nice. At least you won't have the compatibility issues with the slave being built in!

                              Comment

                              Working...