A comparison of two early trapdoors

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fred
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 4977

    #61
    Here is a similar humped band spring on a Remington made Rolling Block rifle.
    DA0CF14D-E58D-47EE-8734-2B088F25E2E9.jpg

    Here is a conventional band spring on a Springfield Armory made Rolling Block rifle.
    CBCD8329-3A49-47A8-AD2A-3B0FA06B3ECB.jpg
    Last edited by Fred; 09-28-2021, 10:15.

    Comment

    • Dick Hosmer
      Very Senior Member - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 5993

      #62
      Well, I've seen similar bands on TDs as well. And, perhaps most of all, WHY, would SA (who had to have had barrels of springs at hand) source one from a Remington? Sorry, just not convinced so far. Maybe they used a 'reject' by accident? We'll never know. Will keep thinking about it though.

      Comment

      • Fred
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 4977

        #63
        Oh that spring wasn’t made by Remington Dick. Remington springs had rounded ends instead of squared.
        The spring on my rifle was I believe made by Springfield, replicating the basic design on the Remington made rifles.
        Last edited by Fred; 09-28-2021, 01:49.

        Comment

        • Dick Hosmer
          Very Senior Member - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 5993

          #64
          Originally posted by Fred
          Oh that spring wasn’t made by Remington Dick. Remington springs had rounded ends instead of squared.
          The spring on my rifle was I believe made by Springfield, replicating the basic design on the Remington made rifles.
          How then, other than pattern of curvature, does the spring differ? Over the years, I've seen springs with pronounced humps, shallow humps, and even some that seemed almost concave. I still maintain that was a non-gauged surface, on a part not not subject to control beyond fitting into the stock mortise (including pin location) and allowing a band to snap tight and stay in place. I just do not think it is a design matter.

          Comment

          • Fred
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 4977

            #65
            First time I’ve had them out of the stock.

            3938A37F-EB45-43F3-859E-4022B3308088.jpg

            Comment

            • Fred
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2009
              • 4977

              #66
              Here is a sharper photo...

              https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/c72/Whitedog333/127114A0-1F64-41E2-8DE9-C700D6F669FA.jpeg?width=450&height=278&crop=fill

              Comment

              • Fred
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2009
                • 4977

                #67
                I think that design of band spring was used by Springfield Armory on their Model 1861 rifle Musket’s and 1865 breech loaders. That would make it an 1855 design.
                Maybe it was thought to be easier to use the 1864 type springs on the 1868’s and when necessary grind down the high hump 1855 springs to conform to the later 1864 design than to use and eventually exhaust the supply of the 1855 type and then have to begin producing them?
                Last edited by Fred; 09-30-2021, 09:50.

                Comment

                • Fred
                  Senior Member
                  • Sep 2009
                  • 4977

                  #68
                  Maybe the change in 1855 to 1864 band spring design was not thought to be of enough significance to’ve been listed as an important change., but the decision was made in 1868 to adhere strictly to one type of spring and that one to be the type of spring that had been used on the 1864 and 1866 long arms and to alter, if needed, the shape of existing 1855 band springs still in inventory to the 1864 shape.
                  Last edited by Fred; 09-30-2021, 09:53.

                  Comment

                  • Kragrifle
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2010
                    • 1161

                    #69
                    Guys, I love this discussion. I have seen and used both types of band springs and did not think twice. If younger collectors out there miss this discussion, shame on them!

                    Comment

                    • Fred
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 4977

                      #70
                      It appears to me that this 1868 rifle, serial number 6, along with probably the other nine or ten first 1868’s made, were each assembled one at a time and then submitted with variations of proposed features that were to be studied and tested preparatory to adopting a final design for production.
                      I would like to see rifles number 5 and 7.
                      Last edited by Fred; 09-30-2021, 09:47.

                      Comment

                      • Kragrifle
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 1161

                        #71
                        Just remembered where I have come across the high hump band spring. I have seen these on a number of 1842 muskets. Of course I am not certain these muskets were all ?as produced ?.

                        Comment

                        • Fred
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2009
                          • 4977

                          #72
                          Interesting!
                          I’ll bet that the humped springs helped to retain the more loose fitting flat barrel bands on those muskets.
                          Last edited by Fred; 10-01-2021, 08:03.

                          Comment

                          • Fred
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 4977

                            #73
                            Receiver inletting to make room for the rear sight base.

                            https://hosting.photobucket.com/images/c72/Whitedog333/C67B290C-BBD9-431C-AAAF-E41D8B81D873.jpeg

                            Comment

                            • Dick Hosmer
                              Very Senior Member - OFC
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 5993

                              #74
                              Better background treatment , but still not white - I could not make it go away. Light needs to come from the muzzle so as to illuminate the recess - speaking of which - I wonder why is it not polished? Was the barrel 'shoe-shined' after assembly? Interesting.

                              Comment

                              • Fred
                                Senior Member
                                • Sep 2009
                                • 4977

                                #75
                                I’’ll remove the rear sight again and have a look. Take a photo.
                                None of these photo’s are meant to be good enough for you to use Dick.
                                I’m just posting them here for entertainment and learning.
                                I’ll take some Good photos for you to look at and email them to you.
                                Last edited by Fred; 10-02-2021, 04:51.

                                Comment

                                Working...