I was at that auction….the gun was about 25% and poor finish. The buyer paid the 31K PLUS an 18 to 20 % commission to the auction house.
1911 North American #5
Collapse
X
-
Comment
-
Which Clawson's book please...
I have a couple Clawsons...but sounds like one I don't have...Can you give details? Title, date, edition etc? 'Still learning here. Thanks Geoff in DEComment
-
Colt .45 Service Pistols, Models of 1911 and 1911A1 by Charles W. Clawson printed by Edwards Bros. , Ann Arbor, MI 48106. 429 pagesComment
-
Here's an interesting comparison:
See: Cool Gun Site North American Arms 1911 photo entitled: "Slide stop and trigger"
I open Google, go to to the Cool Gun Site, find the photo, then open Google Chrome, go to the Culver website, the click on the first photo from this posting. Then go back and forth between Google and Google Chrome.Last edited by milgunsguy; 01-15-2014, 01:48..Comment
-
Thank you, Johnny P.
The metal on #5 lacks square corners where it should have them; it looks like it was polished prior to a reblue. The polishing rounded those corners.
Look at how rounded the metal is at each point of redirection in the machining of the parts.
For example: on the lower edge of the slide stop lever, at the forward end of the slide stop and takedown notches in the slide, at that curve in the flat side of the frame above and in front of the trigger guard, and where the flat side of the slide begins to curve upwards over the top of the pistol.
I am going to leave commenting on the slide markings to the real experts.Last edited by milgunsguy; 01-16-2014, 10:44..Comment
-
The remarkable part about it is the lack of an idiot scratch. Nice find and thanks for sharing.Phillip McGregor (OFC)
"I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthurComment
-
The metal on #5 lacks square corners where it should have them
Ummmm …it does have them . That is a subjective and questionable opinion about the manufacturing capabilities in 1918 and your vision.
Yes you are the only one "see" them. Funny that Clawson and Julis Kosan never noticed……. What a couple of novices…. Glad to see there is one expert who can spot things from a crummy photograph that invalidates opinions of well informed
people who actually have had them in their hand to compare with other known models. What a bunch of dummies to have been sucked in to a Clawson opinion. Thanks for your insight. I sure have learned a lot by reading your post…..and it wasn't about the originality of #5.Comment
-
The pictures speak for themselves.
If you can't see the differences between #5 and the other NA picture that Mr. Peppers posted then it doesn't really matter whether they exist; you're happy.Last edited by milgunsguy; 01-16-2014, 10:01..Comment




Comment