1911 North American #5

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gbethu
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2012
    • 172

    #16
    I was at that auction….the gun was about 25% and poor finish. The buyer paid the 31K PLUS an 18 to 20 % commission to the auction house.

    Comment

    • gbethu
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2012
      • 172

      #17
      Originally posted by milgunsguy
      The pistol looks like a reblule (soft corners on the metal, new sheen to it) with grips that look recently made.
      Can you imagine Chuck Clawson using a refinished gun in his reference books ????? If so, you probably don't know Chuck

      Comment

      • glindes
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2010
        • 242

        #18
        Which Clawson's book please...

        Originally posted by gbethu
        Fortunate to find this beauty. It was used in Clawson's big book as a reference for the North American model.
        I have a couple Clawsons...but sounds like one I don't have...Can you give details? Title, date, edition etc? 'Still learning here. Thanks Geoff in DE

        Comment

        • Johnny P
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 6260

          #19
          Originally posted by glindes
          I have a couple Clawsons...but sounds like one I don't have...Can you give details? Title, date, edition etc? 'Still learning here. Thanks Geoff in DE
          How about photos of those Clawson pistols.

          Comment

          • gbethu
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2012
            • 172

            #20
            Originally posted by glindes
            I have a couple Clawsons...but sounds like one I don't have...Can you give details? Title, date, edition etc? 'Still learning here. Thanks Geoff in DE
            Colt .45 Service Pistols, Models of 1911 and 1911A1 by Charles W. Clawson printed by Edwards Bros. , Ann Arbor, MI 48106. 429 pages

            Comment

            • milgunsguy
              Senior Member
              • May 2010
              • 146

              #21
              Here's an interesting comparison:

              See: Cool Gun Site North American Arms 1911 photo entitled: "Slide stop and trigger"

              I open Google, go to to the Cool Gun Site, find the photo, then open Google Chrome, go to the Culver website, the click on the first photo from this posting. Then go back and forth between Google and Google Chrome.
              Last edited by milgunsguy; 01-15-2014, 01:48.
              .

              Comment

              • Johnny P
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2009
                • 6260

                #22
                Couldn't get that to work. These two pictures?


                Comment

                • gbethu
                  Senior Member
                  • Oct 2012
                  • 172

                  #23
                  serial #5 vs #87

                  Comment

                  • milgunsguy
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2010
                    • 146

                    #24
                    Thank you, Johnny P.

                    The metal on #5 lacks square corners where it should have them; it looks like it was polished prior to a reblue. The polishing rounded those corners.

                    Look at how rounded the metal is at each point of redirection in the machining of the parts.

                    For example: on the lower edge of the slide stop lever, at the forward end of the slide stop and takedown notches in the slide, at that curve in the flat side of the frame above and in front of the trigger guard, and where the flat side of the slide begins to curve upwards over the top of the pistol.

                    I am going to leave commenting on the slide markings to the real experts.
                    Last edited by milgunsguy; 01-16-2014, 10:44.
                    .

                    Comment

                    • KeithNyst
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2009
                      • 145

                      #25
                      For what it's worth, here is a link to an older GunsAmerica posting of #63 with many detail photos.

                      http://www.gunsamerica.com/957251118...Condition.htm#
                      Last edited by KeithNyst; 01-15-2014, 08:00.

                      Comment

                      • PhillipM
                        Very Senior Member - OFC
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 5937

                        #26
                        The remarkable part about it is the lack of an idiot scratch. Nice find and thanks for sharing.
                        Phillip McGregor (OFC)
                        "I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthur

                        Comment

                        • KeithNyst
                          Senior Member
                          • Dec 2009
                          • 145

                          #27
                          Originally posted by PhillipM
                          The remarkable part about it is the lack of an idiot scratch. Nice find and thanks for sharing.
                          It actually does have a pretty good scratch; see photo, bottom row, 2nd from left.

                          Comment

                          • gbethu
                            Senior Member
                            • Oct 2012
                            • 172

                            #28
                            The metal on #5 lacks square corners where it should have them

                            Ummmm …it does have them . That is a subjective and questionable opinion about the manufacturing capabilities in 1918 and your vision.
                            Yes you are the only one "see" them. Funny that Clawson and Julis Kosan never noticed……. What a couple of novices…. Glad to see there is one expert who can spot things from a crummy photograph that invalidates opinions of well informed
                            people who actually have had them in their hand to compare with other known models. What a bunch of dummies to have been sucked in to a Clawson opinion. Thanks for your insight. I sure have learned a lot by reading your post…..and it wasn't about the originality of #5.

                            Comment

                            • milgunsguy
                              Senior Member
                              • May 2010
                              • 146

                              #29
                              The pictures speak for themselves.

                              If you can't see the differences between #5 and the other NA picture that Mr. Peppers posted then it doesn't really matter whether they exist; you're happy.
                              Last edited by milgunsguy; 01-16-2014, 10:01.
                              .

                              Comment

                              • Rob Greer
                                Senior Member
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 114

                                #30
                                Here is another picture of the slide legend from #87, and one of #24 for comparison.

                                #87...


                                ...and #24

                                Comment

                                Working...