More liberal suppression of conservatives

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • clintonhater
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2015
    • 5220

    #16
    Originally posted by togor
    Personally I think Trump may be performing an unintended service to the country by pushing back against the bounds of political correctness when it comes to racial speech.
    It's a liberal lie to call it "racial speech." That "nightmare" (I'm SO glad she applied that term to herself!) deserves to be sent back for her alien & evil IDEOLOGY; her race has nothing to do with it.

    The new liberal definition of "racism" is ANY political criticism leveled at a "person of color." (But not a "colored person," which is now another banned term, though part of the name of the NAACP.)

    Comment

    • lyman
      Administrator - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 11296

      #17
      Originally posted by togor
      Blacks know they live in violence. Blacks also know that when they try to get away from violence, they face resistance from other locations that see them as tainted. Blacks also know that it's super easy for the gang bangers to get guns, because certain whites refuse to change gun laws to restrict supply. So when some princess declares that they have to fix their own problems, willfully oblivious to the full picture, then yeah, that's a tweet deleted, and crown forfeited.
      wait,,,,


      what???

      certain whites refuse to change what gun laws?

      Comment

      • Allen
        Moderator
        • Sep 2009
        • 10627

        #18
        Originally posted by lyman
        wait,,,,


        what???

        certain whites refuse to change what gun laws?
        Yep. Anyone need any further proof? He's been a dedicated anti-American from day one, now he admits he is anti-gun as well. There's only one reason such a person would be a constant contributor/irritation on a politically conservative pro-gun forum.

        Comment

        • clintonhater
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2015
          • 5220

          #19
          Originally posted by lyman
          wait,,,,


          what???

          certain whites refuse to change what gun laws?
          Maybe he means that white racists distribute guns to black gangbangers in the hope they'll kill each other off?

          Comment

          • S.A. Boggs
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 8579

            #20
            Originally posted by clintonhater
            Maybe he means that white racists distribute guns to black gangbangers in the hope they'll kill each other off?
            Makes about as much sense as Torgor states. I believe Allen is close to the truth of what Togor actually is.
            Sam

            Comment

            • Vern Humphrey
              Administrator - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 15875

              #21
              The question is, are gun laws different for Blacks than they are for Whites?

              No, they are not. So why do Blacks have a much higher homicide rate than Whites? It has to be something OTHER than gun laws.

              Comment

              • RED
                Very Senior Member - OFC
                • Aug 2009
                • 11689

                #22
                Originally posted by togor
                Someone please direct Allen to the Mississippi articles of secession.

                Mississippi was the second state to secede from the United States on January 9, 1861 and one of the states to declare the formation of the Confederacy on February 8, 1861. The state's declaration of secession provides one of the clearest connections between secession and slavery.


                Personally I think Trump may be performing an unintended service to the country by pushing back against the bounds of political correctness when it comes to racial speech. In the old days, people just said "I hate n******", or whatever. It was out there where everyone could see it. Now racists can't say that anymore and so they talk in code about crime, welfare checks, music, food, family structure, or some other marker that is related in the minds of their target audience, while everyone denies being racist. The great liberal mistake continues to be to think that if you ban vile forms of expression, then vile attitudes will in time fade. Evidence shows this is clearly not true. Ironically, racists themselves have warmed to the PC speak, because they find talking in code to be the slyer play. By taking us back, Trump might be helping us move forward with a conversation that really has stalled in recent decades.

                togor;561056]Someone please direct Allen to the Mississippi articles of secession.

                That was in the 1860's. That was then and this is now. Nobody alive had anything to do with Mississippi articles of secession. So you want reparations? You already have had them! It was called "Reconstruction." Blacks and carpetbagging yankees siezed billions of dollars from the South. They destroyed the cotton economy, they killed, raped, and murdered ex slave owners and their women. It lasted 10 years... and now you low life MFERS want to do the same thing to the entire country?

                Get real.

                Comment

                • S.A. Boggs
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 8579

                  #23
                  Could it be that "someone" is wanting something from a Government pay out?
                  Sam

                  Comment

                  • togor
                    Banned
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 17610

                    #24
                    Thank you, Red. I know it was the 1860s. Allen said the civil war had nothing to do with slavery, and the most direct way to refute that is the aforementioned articles. Allen's skull is doubtless too thick to take it in, but at least he has a chance.

                    How have you been? Health OK? Getting good care when you need it, I hope.
                    Last edited by togor; 07-20-2019, 02:19.

                    Comment

                    • clintonhater
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2015
                      • 5220

                      #25
                      And now Trump the Racist is working to get the black rapper imprisoned in Sweden released. He's out of his mind if he thinks he'll earn the slightest gratitude from that rapper's family & fans, or blacks in general, by so doing!

                      Comment

                      • togor
                        Banned
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 17610

                        #26
                        How did the old saying go, CH? Every Nazi had their favorite Jew. The idea is that people often see groups of anonymities one way and specific individuals from that group another way, if personal experience from contact is sufficient to overcome bias. Trump is also an able tactician and knows the value of the odd gesture. One article on the subject suggests that Trump views racial tensions opportunistically, which sounds about right.

                        - - - Updated - - -

                        Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                        The question is, are gun laws different for Blacks than they are for Whites?

                        No, they are not. So why do Blacks have a much higher homicide rate than Whites? It has to be something OTHER than gun laws.
                        Now this is actually a good post and I will respond to it later when I have time. Vernon won't read my post but that's ok. I'm here for the lurkers too.
                        Last edited by togor; 07-20-2019, 02:31.

                        Comment

                        • Allen
                          Moderator
                          • Sep 2009
                          • 10627

                          #27
                          Originally posted by RED
                          togor;561056]Someone please direct Allen to the Mississippi articles of secession.

                          That was in the 1860's. That was then and this is now. Nobody alive had anything to do with Mississippi articles of secession. So you want reparations? You already have had them!
                          Since this has been brought to my attention I will respond to togor who obviously can not read the English language which is to be expected. My comment was that INITIALLY the civil war was not fought over slavery. A war of some type probably would have occurred regardless as some of the states wanted secession over taxation.



                          Like togor's raghead hero Ilhan Omar would have said "some people would have did something".

                          If reparations come I want mine for having to pay $1400 a month group health insurance so obamacare would have the money to take care of the thugs and irresponsible's of this country free of charge (for them).
                          Last edited by Allen; 07-20-2019, 03:55.

                          Comment

                          • togor
                            Banned
                            • Nov 2009
                            • 17610

                            #28
                            Allen adding the adverb initially does nothing to redeem your fallacy. All of the seceding states that formed the Confederacy practiced slavery. Slavery was explicitly cited as a proximal cause of secession in some of the articles. The Confederacy then fired the first shots. From the southern perspective secession was all about preserving slavery. They felt the balance was tipping against them as new states entered the union free, and that it was only a matter of time until there were enough states willing to amend the Constitution to ban slavery everywhere.
                            Last edited by togor; 07-20-2019, 04:28.

                            Comment

                            • togor
                              Banned
                              • Nov 2009
                              • 17610

                              #29
                              Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                              The question is, are gun laws different for Blacks than they are for Whites?

                              No, they are not. So why do Blacks have a much higher homicide rate than Whites? It has to be something OTHER than gun laws.
                              Not just gun laws. Many laws work better in some places than others, owing to local factors. But certainly the ease with which gang bangers can re-supply with arms doesn't help. Sure, I suppose we can leave the honest people in those areas to their fate.

                              But consider another place afflicted with a scourge: Appalachia and pills. The laws that work elsewhere don't stop the pills from pouring into that region. (Washington Post just ran a worthwhile piece on this if people can read it.). We could leave it to the locals to go to counseling and get their sh*t together instead of bothering the rest of us with their pill problem, but that's not really the conversation, is it? Instead we're hearing about lawsuits against the companies and new rules about how pills get dispensed. A very different response.
                              Last edited by togor; 07-20-2019, 04:52.

                              Comment

                              • S.A. Boggs
                                Senior Member
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 8579

                                #30
                                Originally posted by togor
                                Blacks know they live in violence. Blacks also know that when they try to get away from violence, they face resistance from other locations that see them as tainted. Blacks also know that it's super easy for the gang bangers to get guns, because certain whites refuse to change gun laws to restrict supply. So when some princess declares that they have to fix their own problems, willfully oblivious to the full picture, then yeah, that's a tweet deleted, and crown forfeited.
                                Togor or whatever your real Russian name is this statement is your undoing! Gent's I along with other's have felt that Togor and RKT were one and the same. There have been little things that just didn't seem right, the feeling just was wrong. RKT and Togor often posting within minutes of each other. Togor states he works as an electrical engineer yet his computer is locked into our site. Regardless of what time I logged on Togor was logged on as well. Seems odd that a work computer is locked onto our site, now doesn't it? Lately we have a pervert Mauser 45 who seems to play off of them.
                                When I called out Nazi who voiced the loudest?. When Germany invaded Russia, Russia suffered a great deal from what the Nazi's did to them. Togor really got bent out of shape and rightly so...for a Russian.
                                Our government has warned us of Russian Psych OP to split us, Togor is doing a good job in his disruption. The NKVD, KGB, GRU would be proud of their "Comrade" Togor and yes, remember Togor's "Comrade" comment recently.
                                Togor is going to chide me on my comments as Togor has to repair his slip to continue Togor's mission of disruption here. To engage with Togor/RKT is to aid and abet the Russian cause of disinformation and harm to America. Togor/RKT is a very good Russian operative but NOT OUR COMRADE!
                                Sam

                                Comment

                                Working...